Socioeconomic aspects of day case surgery for hemorrhoids

Journal Title: Lietuvos Chirurgija - Year 2006, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Objective This study explores the patients’ attitude towards the day case surgery of haemorrhoids. Patients and methods Patients operated on in 2003 because of hemorrhoids were questioned by mail (a retrospective study). All the patients had been suffering from stage III–IV haemorrhoids. Anesthesia of the perianal block with intravenous sedation and the Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy were applied. COX-2 inhibitors were used for pain prevention and postoperative analgesia. Results The anus problems before the operation in 94.1% of the respondents impeded their social activities and work. 91.2% of the patients after the operation had no complaints they suffered before the operation. 21 (62%) respondents experienced no problems at all. The perineal block analgesia was evaluated as excellent by 13 (38.2%) patients, as very good by 11 (32.4%), as good by 6 (17.6%), as not bad by 4 (11.8%). Postoperative analgesia was evaluated as excellent by 6 (17.6%) patients, as very good by 12 (35.3%), as good by 11 (32.4%), as not bad by 5 (14.7%). One-day hospital stay was evaluated as sufficient by 28 (82.4%) patients, and 6 (17.6%) patients considered that the in-hospital stay too short. Sixteen patients were treated by the operating surgeon (47%), by a clinic surgeon (7–20.5%), by family doctor (4– 12%), 7–20.5% recovered on their own guided by the operating surgeon instructions. The anus healing lasted (according to the patients) from 2 to 12 weeks. The patients went back to work not equally quickly. Six (17.6%) needed 1 week, 5 (14.7%) 2 weeks, 6 (17.6%) 3 weeks, 6 (17.6%) 4 weeks, 3 (9%) 6 weeks to recover. Eight patients (23.5%) were unemployed or retired. Conclusions One-day hospital stay was evaluated as sufficient by 28 (82.4%) patients. The perineal block analgesia during the operation was evaluated positively by all the patients. None of the patients noted the postoperative analgesia with the COX-2-specific inhibitor as insufficient. Long-term observation by the operating surgeon improves the socioeconomic results.

Authors and Affiliations

Paulius Žeromskas, Audrius Janėnas, Kęstutis Strupas

Keywords

Related Articles

Hemorojaus gydymas sudėtiniu preparatu Ginkor Fort

Tikslas. Įvertinti "Beaufour Ipsen" firmos gaminamo preparato Ginkor Fort veiksmingumą gydant hemorojų. Metodas. Trijose skirtingose ambulatorinio gydymo įstaigose buvo gydyti 48 ligoniai. Apklau...

Pooperacinių pilvo sienos išvaržų plastika alotransplantatu

Įvadas / tikslas. Įvertinti pooperacinių pilvo sienos išvaržų gydymo naudojant sintetinį tinklą ankstyvuosius ir vėlyvuosius pooperacinius rezultatus ir veiksnius, lemian&#26...

Socioeconomic aspects of day case surgery for hemorrhoids

Objective This study explores the patients’ attitude towards the day case surgery of haemorrhoids. Patients and methods Patients operated on in 2003 because of hemorrhoids were questioned by mail (a retrospective stud...

Prostate urothelial carcinoma diagnosed on prostatic needle biopsy. Case report with literature overview

Objective. To establish criteria for the diagnosis of primary urothelial prostate carcinoma after the differential diagnosis including high-grade urothelial carcinoma extending into the bladder neck and prostate versus...

Treatment of hemorrhoids with the composite medication Ginkor Fort

Background / objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Ginkor Fort medication (Beaufour Ipsen) for the outpatient treatment of hemorrhoids. Methods. Forty-eight patients were treated in three different outpati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP91194
  • DOI -
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Paulius Žeromskas, Audrius Janėnas, Kęstutis Strupas (2006). Socioeconomic aspects of day case surgery for hemorrhoids. Lietuvos Chirurgija, 4(3), 221-225. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-91194