Soul or Mind? Some Remarks on Explanation in Cognitive Science
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
In the article author analyses the extent to which it is possible to regard the Aristotelian conception of the soul as actually necessary and applicable for modern neuroscience. The framework in which this objective is going to be accomplished is provided by the idea of the coexistence of the “manifest” and “scientific” images of the world and persons, as introduced by Wilfrid Sellars. In subsequent sections, author initially formulates an answer to the questions of what it is that Aristotle sought to explain with his conception of soul as formal cause, and how this notion could be portrayed in terms drawn from contemporary neurological science. It is author’s intention to show that no other concepts—be they the Cartesian “mind” or a Chalmers-style “self”—come anywhere close to matching the breadth of scope of Aristotelian “soul”. At the same time, though, analysis carried out here do not intend to undertake any kind of defence of the soul as a spiritual entity of the sort popular where religious faith is concerned, namely as an entity separable from the body, immortal, and inimitably tied to God. Then, in the second major part of the article, author analyses the extent to which the Aristotelian conception of the soul can be thought of as involving criteria of the sort that we encounter in the contemporary theory of strong emergence. According to the author the theory of strong emergence has, as a heuristic theory, quite general predictive and explanatory power as regards the field of human thought and behaviour.
Authors and Affiliations
Józef Bremer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327435
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.023
- Views 58
- Downloads 0
Modeling Mystery
The practice of model-building is very common in analytic philosophical theology. Yet many other theologians worry that any attempt to model God must be hubristic and idolatrous. A better understanding of scientific mode...
Soul or Mind? Some Remarks on Explanation in Cognitive Science
In the article author analyses the extent to which it is possible to regard the Aristotelian conception of the soul as actually necessary and applicable for modern neuroscience. The framework in which this objective is g...
Knowledge Argument versus Bundle Theory according to Derek Parfit
According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence o...
Mariano Artigas y la relación de la filosofía con la teología fundamental. Evocación y debate
Mariano Artigas and the relationship of philosophy to fundamental theology. Evocation and debate The first point of the paper evoques the autor’s personal relation with Prof. Mariano Artigas. Draw the convergent and div...
In search of the person. Towards a real revolution
The discussion about a difference between brain and soul or mind is now at the center of the anthropological debate. It seems that the pioneers in this current polemic have a reductionistic view of human nature, inherite...