Sovereignty as an environmental practice: the problem of territoriality and anthropocentrism
Journal Title: Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations - Year 2023, Vol 2, Issue 23
Abstract
The article is a theoretical study of state sovereignty. By looking at the concept in a different way from traditional methods, it tries to discern whether sovereignty is necessarily antithetical to a sustainable world. Emphasis is put on its territoriality and anthropocentrism – both of which make it into a major obstacle when tackling global and transnational environmental problems. State sovereignty is analyzed as an environmental practice of the state, which allows for the control of resources to be used by capital. The analysis is conducted using theoretical and conceptual critique as the main method. It is based on various sources ranging from critical geopolitics and critical geography to political science and political ecology, including the concept of Capitalocene. As long as sovereignty remains utilized by the state in service to capital, it will be used to cement its ability to control space and extract resources. However, a different kind of sovereignty is imaginable and therefore the institution itself is neither friend nor enemy to environmental politics. This new understanding of sovereignty opens up new avenues for theoretical research in political ecology and International Relations, bridging the gap between traditional state-centric approaches and the transboundary nature of ecological problems.
Authors and Affiliations
Piotr Walewicz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP740619
- DOI 10.12688/stomiedintrelat.17575.2
- Views 49
- Downloads 0
The idea of a fragile state: Emergence, conceptualization, and application in international political practice
This paper studies the concept of a ‘fragile state,’ its origins, uniqueness, and the circumstances determining the changing dynamics of the presented subject, as well as the possibility of its application in the practic...
Examining the South China Sea Dispute with General Morphological Analysis
The South China Sea dispute is among the most volatile flashpoints in contemporary international relations. This study examines this dispute using the general morphological analysis (GMA) methodology employing eight fact...
A neoclassical-realist analysis of Japan’s stance on cross-strait relations
Since 1972, Tokyo has maintained official diplomatic relations with Beijing, while stressing the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. Based on governmental documents and decision-makers’ political...
The gridlock of the Trans-Himalayan railway: China’s strategic calculations about Nepal
Although discussion about connecting Chinese railways to Nepal borders first surfaced in the year 1973, it could not make any headway until the political change of 2006 in Nepal, when the idea of linking Tibet with Kathm...
Deterrence, resilience, and engagement: Tokyo’s response to the Ukraine war and Russia-China alignment
Russia’s unprovoked attack against Ukraine entails significant implications to Japan’s security and its surrounding environment. How is Japan responding to Russia’s use of force? What are the drivers of its responses? Th...