Spanish cycling and attitudes towards doping of different stakeholders involved

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to know and compare the attitudes towards doping among different groups involved in Spanish cycling: future physical trainers, elite cyclists, young cyclists, and cycling team managers. The sample was composed of 492 participants (23.48±7.5 years) from different cycling contexts: university students of Sport Sciences degree -SS- (n = 271; 22.04±3.3 years), Elite Cyclist’s -EC- (n = 65; 18.43±2.9 years), Young Cyclists -YC- (n = 44; 13.0±0.82 years), and Cycling Team Managers -CTM- (n = 112; 33.65±7.17 years). A cross-sectional descriptive design was carried out using the Spanish version of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS) which is a 17-items six-point Likert-type scale ranging from 17 to 102 points (1= Strongly Disagree; 6= Strongly Agree). For the whole sample, the overall score was 36.12±10.09. Regarding different groups, data were as follows: SS: 34.69±9.31; EC: 35.14±8.63; YC: 37.62±11.30; CTM: 40.12±11.27. Significant differences were observed between SS and CTM (p=0.000) groups and between EC and CTM groups (p=0.006). Spanish cycling, in general, is not permissive in relation to doping. By the way, cycling team managers, the oldest group, are significantly more lenient towards doping than EC and future physical trainers (SS). It could be suggested that “something is changing positively” in relation to attitudes towards doping in Spanish cycling, being the youngest the most sensible group, so changes could be seen in the medium-long term, not immediately. Data from YC group, more permissive than SS and EC groups, support the idea that anti-doping education programmes are needed from early ages.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime Morente-Sánchez| Faculty of Sport Sciences, (University of Granada). Department of Physical Education and Sport. Carretera de Alfacar s/n (18011). Granada, Spain, Mikel Zabala| Faculty of Sport Sciences, (University of Granada). Department of Physical Education and Sport. Carretera de Alfacar s/n (18011). Granada, Spain

Keywords

Related Articles

Differences in static and dynamic bike fit with 3d motion capture

Background: Bicycle fitting is the adjustment of bicycle configuration to suit rider requirements through appropriate placement of contact points; pedals, saddle and handlebars (Burke 1994: Clin Sports Med, 13(1), 1-14)....

Differences in visual information-seeking behavior between expert and novice time-trial cyclists

Introduction: Pacing can be defined as an ability to distribute available energy resources during the race (Hettinga et al., 2006). It’s a determinant of athletic performance, affected by an interaction between previous...

Reliability and validity of PowerCal power distribution during cycling time trial

The PowerCal device (Cyclops, Madison, USA) is a heart rate (HR) strap that estimates power output (PO) using an algorithm computed from the HR response recorded during exercise. The device is a low-cost method (~ 99 US...

Effects of recovery using contrast water therapy or compression stockings on subsequent 5-min cycling performance

Many researchers have investigated the effectiveness of contrast water therapy (CWT) or compression stockings (CS) during recovery, using subsequent performance as the principal outcome measure. However, data in the lite...

Acute cycling sport causes upper respiratory tract infections and lung function loss among male recreational cyclists of different age groups

Background: Prolonged high intensity aerobic activity could lead to suppression of mucosal immune proteins like salivary IgA subclass, lactoferrin causing temporary immune suppressed state which may lead to Upper respira...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2827
  • DOI -
  • Views 303
  • Downloads 30

How To Cite

Jaime Morente-Sánchez, Mikel Zabala (2014). Spanish cycling and attitudes towards doping of different stakeholders involved. Journal of Science and Cycling, 3(1), 21-25. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-2827