Spinal anesthesia at L2-3 vs L3-4 levels: comparison of onset of block, maximum level of block and hemodynamic response in obstetric patients undergoing caesarian section

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 4

Abstract

Background and Aims: Today intrathecal anaesthesia is used for almost any procedure below umbilicus. The present study evaluated Spinal anesthesia at L2-3 vs L3-4 levels with comparison of onset of block, maximum level of block and hemodynamic response in obstetric patients undergoing caesarian section. Methodology: The study was conducted on seventy patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II of age group 18–37 years, allocated to one of the two groups of thirty five patients each. Group I received spinal anaesthesia at L2-L3 and Group II received spinal anaesthesia at L3-L4. Patients were monitored for onset of sensory and motor block, total duration of sensory block, level of sensory block, intraoperative haemodynamic characteristics and VAS score. Results: Demographic variables were comparable. The onset times of sensory and motor block were significantly shorter in group I (7.10±1.40), (9.45±1.30) than group II (9.50±1.30), (13.00±1.20). There was a significant difference between the two groups in achieving the height of sensory block in the first 30 minutes after intrathecal injection (p<0.001). The median height of the sensory block for patients in group I was T8 whereas in group II, it was T9. The incidence of hypotension showed no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the two groups. The severity of intra operative pain, estimated using a 10 cm VAS, was significantly higher (p=0.038) in group I than in the group II at the beginning of the caesarean section while in the later course of the surgery no statistical difference was found. Conclusion: Intrathecal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine administered in L2–3 interspace for caesarean section provides superior analgesia, significantly earlier onset of sensory and motor block and equal hemodynamic stability as compared to spinal anaesthesia administered in the L3–4 interspace

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Shahzada Gani

Keywords

Related Articles

Current Spectrum of Dermatophytosis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India – A 6-Year Clinico-Mycological Study

Dermatophytosis is a common infection of skin, hair and nails caused by Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton species. The incidence in a particular region varies with population migration, culture and environment...

Communication between the Branches of Brachial Plexus on Arm: A Cadaveric Study

Aim of The Study: Communications between the branches of brachial plexus are commonly observed and it has a number of clinical and surgical implications. This study will provide information about variations of Brachial p...

Urinary Cystatin C as an Early Biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically ill Patient

Introduction: Acute kidney injury is associated with high mortality in critically ill patients. We usually measure serum creatinine to detect AKI, but it is a poor predictor of accuracy particularly in the early stages o...

Study of Electrocardiographic Changes in Acute Stroke

Aims and Objectives: The present study was undertaken to find out ECG abnormalities associated with acute stroke and relationship of these abnormalities in cerebrovascular accident with mortality and prognosis. Method: T...

A Comprehensive Study and Creation of Profile of Trauma Patients Admitted in ICU of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India

A comprehensive study was conducted on trauma patients admitted in ICU of a leading tertiary hospital. The study was based on evaluation of head injury taking care of studying epidemiological aspect also. In a total case...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP512648
  • DOI -
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Shahzada Gani (2018). Spinal anesthesia at L2-3 vs L3-4 levels: comparison of onset of block, maximum level of block and hemodynamic response in obstetric patients undergoing caesarian section. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 6(4), 838-842. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-512648