Split society: proposals for the operationalization of the terms
Journal Title: Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право. - Year 2018, Vol 3, Issue
Abstract
The article analyzes a definition of the destabilization of a heterogeneous society in the scientific literature. Consuming in the dosages of political phenomena in the law of the spheres and in the systematic unsteadiness of the alternating operations of science-based science terms. From the proper and unified awareness of the significance of these definitions, further scientific (in the context of suitability for comparison and delineation with other concomitant phenomena) and practical value (use in forecasting and planning of political activity) of theoretical constructions will depend on the value of these definitions. To the historiography of the issue, put forward in the title of the article, can be attributed to scientific research and labor within: - theory of social cleavages of Upset - Rokkana; - discourse around the concepts of «distributed rule», which particularly distinguishes the names of such bright comparators as A. Leiphartand D. Horowitz; - concepts of civilizational breakdowns by O. Spengler, A. Toynbee and S. Huntington. The purpose of this article is to substantiate the adequacy of the dynamic approach proposed by us to ascertaining the transformation of the lines of social separation into a threat to the integrity of the state, characterized by a sequence of stages of the disintegration of the integrity of polity, the application of the term «social split» as a stage following the division of society and preceding it collapse. The author argues that society in the modern state, as a heterogeneous integral system, operates in the interval between marginal interval points of the pre-political state of quasi-monotony and decay. The article states that the qualitative conditions of society in the context of secessional threats on this interval correspond only to two stages, which for different societies can be located at different «distances» from the «beginning / end» of the interval. The key difference between the stages of the author determines the presence of conflict articulation incompatible to the simultaneous satisfaction of interests allocated by primordial features of social groups.
Authors and Affiliations
Д. О. Попков
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP658199
- DOI -
- Views 99
- Downloads 0
Duty as a kind of work
Duty is considered employee's stay at the direction of the employer at the enterprise before or after the end of the working day or on non-working days as the person responsible for the order with the purpose of an uni...
Socio-demographic model of electoral behavior and gender stereotypes
Gender electoral stereotypes concept is a developing paradigm are not key in electoral researches in Ukraine. However, if models are based on traditional concepts (the sociological (social background), socio-psychologica...
The conflict potential of inter-state relations in the Middle East after the ‘Arab Spring’: the current state and prospects of development
The development of the contemporary system of international relations in the Middle East is marked by a high intensity of the conflict-based type of interactions between key actor of the regional politics, which thereby...
Independent Ukraine in geopolitical discourse: milestones and accents
The article analyzes research focused on the geopolitical problems of modern Ukraine. On this basis, the author highlights key topics that are important for studying of the geopolitical orientations of the Ukrainian’s po...
About principles of social security financing
The article examines the problem of the concept and system of principles of social security financing of the Ukrainian population. Given the concept of «principles of social security financing». The article gives a det...