Standard of proof ‘reasonable suspicion’ in criminal proceedings
Journal Title: Правова позиція - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of standard of proof ‘reasonable suspicion’ in criminal proceedings. In the first part of the article the legal notion of standard of proof is established. It is argued that the standard of proof has three essential characteristics: 1) variability, 2) close relation to burden of proof, and 3) serves as the decision threshold which sets an evidential level. The second part of the article touches on the legal nature of ‘reasonable suspicion’ standard. Based in the analysis of the ECtHR and the US Supreme Court case-law it is suggested that the ‘reasonable suspicion’ standard could be defined as the sum of specific and articulable facts that can satisfy an objective observer (that is not a legal professional) that a person in question may have committed a criminal offence. At the same time application of such facts could be subject to some restrictions. It is established that such facts shall not justify a conviction of the person but possible involvement to a crime. Thus judges shall provide concrete reasons for their findings of reasonable suspicion and do not try to eliminate all reasonable doubts. It is concluded that prospective study shall focus on the relation between standards of ‘reasonable suspicion’ and ‘probable cause’ both of which are applied in making interim criminal procedural decisions.
Authors and Affiliations
І. В. Гловюк, А. С. Степаненко
On some issues of the trial of cases on violation of the customs rules started according to features of article 472 of the Customs Code of Ukraine
The systematic analysis of foreign economic operations and the determination of their expediency, control of the routes of goods and vehicles, and the strengthening of control over the implementation of foreign economic...
The principle of the rule of law in the system of principles of administrative and legal support integrity judges
The article is devoted to the analysis of the essence of the principle of the rule of law and its significance for the system of principles of administrative and legal support for the integrity of judges. The author note...
Return of the case for additional investigation and new forms of reinstatement of pre-trial investigation under the court decision in the criminal procedure of Ukraine
The institute of returning the case for further investigation have been seen by the legislator as a procedural mechanism for eliminating inaccuracies and incomplete pre-trial investigation both in the Soviet criminal pro...
Storage of things that are disputed between persons according to judge decision: civil legal aspect
The article is devoted to consideration specificity of establishment legal civil relationships of storage things that is subject of the dispute on basis of court’s decision. The author determines that storage of things t...
Problematic issues of the creation of anti-corruption courts in Ukraine
The article deals with the problems associated with the creation of anti-corruption courts. It is substantiated that the creation of a separate unit of anti-corruption courts in Ukraine is an important step aimed at effe...