Stress Response to Laryngoscopy:Comparison between Macintoshand Mccoy’s Type Laryngoscope Blades

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2017, Vol 16, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction:Laryngoscopy and intubation is known to cause exaggerated hemodynamic response and increased intracranial pressure. Earlier studies have shown that the type of laryngoscope blade influences the degree of hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation. The aim of the study was to to compare the stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubationwhile using Macintosh and McCoy type blades. Materials & Methods:It is a prospective, comparative study including 60 patients undergoing various surgical procedures requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation between age group 20-50 years of both sexes with ASA grade 1 and 2 were chosen. The 60 cases were divided into two groups randomly (using table of random numbers): Group A: 30 Patients undergoing laryngoscopy with the Macintosh blade (size 3) and; Group B: 30 patients undergoing laryngoscopy with the McCoy blade (size 3). After induction and neuromuscular blockade pre-intubation pulse and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded. Orotracheal intubation was attempted at this stage using laryngoscope blade assigned to respective group. Pulse and MAP was recorded while the blade was being inserted in vallecula. Similar pulse and blood pressure was taken at 2 minute and 5 minute after laryngoscopy. Ease of intubation was noted by knowing total time required for intubation, need for BURP maneuver and occurrence of any complication. Data was analyzed using SPSS software ver. 21. Results: Time for Laryngoscopy was significantly less with McCoy blade as compared to Macintosh blades (16.2 sec vs 19.55 sec; p<0.01). BURP manuver was never required with Mccoy blade but with Macintosh blade it was required in 36.7% of patients (p<0.01). Both groups were comparable in terms of baseline hemodynamic parameters. Post-laryngoscopy and Intubation till 2 minutes, heart rate and mean arterial pressures were significantly higher with Macintosh group compared to Mccoy group. Conclusion: McCoy’s blade provides better visualization of larynx and intubating conditions with minimal haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy

Authors and Affiliations

Jayshree Vaswani, Chirag Malik, Yogesh Bhalerao, Varsha Vyas, Kirtika Chedda

Keywords

Related Articles

Immediate Implant Placement And Restoration With Natural Tooth In The Maxillary Central Incisor: A Clinical Report

Anterior tooth loss and restoration in the esthetic zone is a common challenge in dentistry today. The prominent visibility of the area can be especially distressing to the patient and requires a timely and esthetically...

Compliance of Infection Control Practices At out Patient Department At A Tertiary Care Hospital

Health care personnel should show compliance to guidelines of Infection control practices and antimicrobial stewardship programme to prevent nosocomial transmission of infectious pathogens. Main aim of the study is to pr...

Effect of Yogic Practices on Vital Capacity – A Pilot Study Among University Men Students

Life style changes and urbanization have led to increasing proportions of many lung diseases. In general, with a reduction of regular exercises among young males, the vital capacity tends to decrease. This factor may inc...

Depression, Anxiety and Smartphone Addiction among Medical Students

Introduction: A Smartphone, is a term for distinguishing mobile phones with advanced features from basic feature phones. Smart phone was introduced in the market for a new class of mobile phones that provide integrated s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590324
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1601087680
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jayshree Vaswani, Chirag Malik, Yogesh Bhalerao, Varsha Vyas, Kirtika Chedda (2017). Stress Response to Laryngoscopy:Comparison between Macintoshand Mccoy’s Type Laryngoscope Blades. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 16(1), 76-80. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590324