Students’ Satisfaction as a Competitive Advantage in the Financial Products Market: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Competitiveness - Year 2014, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

The main task of today’s banks, in both investigated countries, should be to prefer students’ satisfaction and strive to offer them what they want. Nowadays, banks own many tools for satisfying their customers, however, there are still a number of areas where financial organizations could focus their attention to improve their relationships with students. The next related issue within the context of students in the banking environment is to gain an insight into student preferences on choosing a bank or purchasing bank products and services and find out which country provides more advantageous banking products and services and under what conditions, which type of marketing communication they prefer, and whether current bank marketing stimulates them to purchase. In this comparative study, a survey questionnaire was developed which incorporated the main findings of current literature on this issue. The results of self-administrated on-line questionnaires from Czech and UK higher education students will be presented in this article, involving one university from each country. The findings highlight that, while the conditions of provided student bank accounts are very similar and this type of bank account is very popular in both countries, the quantitative research found big differences in satisfaction with personal contact in banks and students’ preferences. It was also confirmed that students in both countries resist special offers and marketing efforts of banks and in the area of their finances they rather trust in banking institutions with long-tested quality and reliability of services. The research also detected that satisfaction with price is significantly affected by paying bank charges among Czech students and further gaps in the range of banking products and the use of distribution channels are identified. A series of Fisher´s tests, Pearson´s tests, and Two-sample proportion tests were conducted to reveal these significant differences in student satisfaction and opportunities for gaining a greater competitive advantage.

Authors and Affiliations

Michaela Banarova

Keywords

Related Articles

Tools of Internal Communication from Knowledge Transfer Perspective

The world nowadays is very often titled as the world of knowledge. Knowledge is a critical differentiator for companies and source of competitive advantage. Therefore companies pay careful attention to knowledge manageme...

The Verification of Structural Decision-Making Model for Evaluating Education on Facebook

The aim of this paper is to present the work of the research team who tried to construct a model that explores general opinions of students about education on Facebook and also opinions of students about education on the...

Students’ Satisfaction as a Competitive Advantage in the Financial Products Market: A Comparative Study

The main task of today’s banks, in both investigated countries, should be to prefer students’ satisfaction and strive to offer them what they want. Nowadays, banks own many tools for satisfying their customers, however,...

The Nursing Shortage Impact on Job Outcome (The Case in Sri Lanka)

The nursing shortage is a common problem throughout the world. Nurses form the largest proportion of the healthcare system and play a significant role in providing direct patient care. Considering the importance of the r...

Trend Analysis of Human Resources Development Representing the Base for Researchers in Selected Economies

This paper discusses the issue of precondition for the number of researchers as an important input factor for research and development (hereinafter ‘R&D’). R&D is one of the main sources for new knowledge creatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP110207
  • DOI 10.7441/joc.2014.01.07
  • Views 173
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michaela Banarova (2014). Students’ Satisfaction as a Competitive Advantage in the Financial Products Market: A Comparative Study. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(1), 104-123. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-110207