Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dextmedetomidine Vs Midazolam in Gynacological Laproscopic Surgery

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 3

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgeries under are associated with unique hemodynamic changes thus a basic need is felt among the anaesthesiologist fraternity for the desired availability of a drug that effectively suppresses all the hazardous responses to obnoxious stimuli with a maximum safety margin. Dexmedetomidine due to its distinct sedation, analgesia and sympatholytic properties can be used as an anaesthetic adjuvant in anaesthesia for Laparoscopic surgeries. Thus we undertook this double blind, prospective comparative study. Methods: Fifty women undergoing Laparoscopic gynaecological Surgeries divided randomly by a computer generated table into two groups of 25 each. D group - Dexmedetomidine loading dose 1µg/kg followed by maintenance infusion of Dexmedetomidine at 0.4µg/kg/hr M Group – Midazolam loading dose 0.03 mg/kg followed by maintenance infusion of saline. Both the group were given Fentanyl citrate 1ug/kg. We undertook this double blind, prospective comparative study to evaluate efficacy and safety and its effect on sedation, hemodynamic, anaesthesia and analgesia requirement and recovery characteristics. Results: Baseline Mean degree of sedation was same but after 5 min study drug it was 2 for group D compared to group M -1.32 and postoperative 1.16 for group D and 1.08 for group M. Mean heart rate was 73.84 for group D and 74.52 for group M. Mean blood pressure was 100.84 for group D and 102.56 for group M. Same trend observed at the time of induction, intubation, mean during pneumoperitonium and mean value in PACU. Mean dose of fentanyl required was less 65µg compared to 93.4µg in group M. Conclusion: This randomised, double blind study demonstrated that when compared to Midazolam Dexmedetomidine is more effective anaesthetic adjuvant that causes adequate sedation without respiratory depression, decreases requirement of anaesthetic and opioid, attenuate sympathoadrenal response, maintains stable haemodynamics perioperatively at the same time provide excellent recovery profile without any adverse events but continuous monitoring for hypotension and bradycardia is essential during first two hours of postoperative period if higher infusion rate are used.

Authors and Affiliations

Yogesh Magan Suryavanshi

Keywords

Related Articles

Fluid Therapy in Gastrointestinal Surgeries

Gastrointestinal surgery is a major physiological insult to the body accounting for significant fluid and electrolyte disturbances. Therefore a judicious peri-operative fluid therapy needs to be considered in such cases...

A Study on Combined Spinal Epidural Labour Analgesia a Comparison between 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl

Introduction: The responsibility of the Anaesthesiologist in obstetrics is arguably greater than in any other fields of anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the quality of epidural analgesia of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.1% ropiv...

Blood Pressure and Pulse Changes after Injection of Local Anesthesia and Adrenaline in Oral Surgical Procedures

Lignocaine with adrenaline is used in oral surgical procedures widely. Catecholamines have a significant role in increasing haemodyanmic parameters like blood pressure, blood glucose level and pulse rate. In this sudy we...

Intrathecal Nalbuphine versus Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia of Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

ntroduction: Opioids are used as adjuncts with the local anaesthetic for longer duration of action and better postoperative analgesia [4]. Nalbuphine, is a mixed agonist-antagoniste and its analgesic potency is equal to...

Comparison of Bupivacaine 0.375% and Ropivacaine 0.375% in Supraclavicular Block under Ultrasound Guidance for Upper Limb Surgeries

Background: Regional anesthesia is comparatively safer than general anesthesia. Regional anesthesia can be safely used in outpatient anesthesia, patients with full stomach, diabetic patients, associated cardiac, pulmonar...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP533237
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5318.2
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Yogesh Magan Suryavanshi (2018). Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dextmedetomidine Vs Midazolam in Gynacological Laproscopic Surgery. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(3), 364-371. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-533237