Study on soil carbon dioxide, methane flux of growing season in karst hilly area

Journal Title: 广东农业科学 - Year 2018, Vol 45, Issue 9

Abstract

The growing season in the karst hilly area of southwest China is long, and the flux of CO 2 and CH 4 on the soil surface is greatly affected by the vegetation cover on the surface. To investigate the CO 2 and CH4 fluxes and their diurnal variations of soil surface covered with vegetation (with grass) and non-vegetation cover (without grass) in the growing season of karst hilly area, the CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes on the soil surface in the Nanchuan karst hilly area in Chongqing were studied by static box-gas chromatography, combined with soil temperature and humidity research. The results showed that the surface of soil in karst hilly area showed CO 2 source and CH 4 sink during the growing season. The soil CO 2 fluxes were significantly higher than that of grass-free CO 2 fluxes, while there was no significant difference between grass and grass-free CH 4 fluxes on the soil surface. It indicates that vegetation cover on the surface of the growing season is an important factor affecting soil CO 2 flux, while vegetation cover has no significant effect on soil CH 4 flux. Soil CO 2 flux and grass-free CO 2 flux were 552 mg/m 2· h, 352 mg/m 2· h; Soil grass CH 4 flux and grass-free CH 4 flux were - 80μg/m 2· h,- 75 μg/m 2· h(6-month average of growing season). On the scale of the growing season, the soil also appears as CO 2 source and CH 4 sink. The CO 2 flux of grasses was significantly higher than that of grass-free CO 2 fluxes, and the change characteristics of the two were onsistent; however, the CH 4 flux on the soil surface is less affected by vegetation cover. There is a positive correlation between soil CO 2 flux and soil temperature. That is, soil temperature increase will promote soil CO 2 flux, while soil CH 4 flux has no correlation with soil temperature, so soil temperature has no significant effect on soil CH 4 flux. Since the soil moisture change during the growing season is smaller than the soil temperature, the effect of soil moisture on soil CO 2 flux and soil CH 4 flux is smaller than soil temperature.

Authors and Affiliations

Jiu-chan LIU, Yu-chuan SUN

Keywords

Related Articles

Analysis of influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to participate in the carbon sequestration forest management

"Increasing the forestry carbon sequestration is the important ways to deal with climate change issues for China. Farmers are the provider of production factors during the carbon sequestration forest management. Therefor...

Effects of low temperature stress on seedling emergence and seedling growth of direct-seeding early rice

"In order to explore the effect of low temperature stress from sowing to seedling growth of early rice. With Zhongjiazao17 as material,the effects of low temperature and treatment time on the morphological and physiolog...

Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Dendrobium cariniferum

"In order to establish a rapid propagation system for Dendrobium cariniferum Rchb. f., the immature seeds were selected as explants to study the suitable medium for for tissue culture, and mediums aseptic seed germinatio...

Study on biochemical composition fingerprints of Yingde black tea NO. 9

"Measuring the biochemical components content of 23 black teas of NO.9 in different seasons and 6 other varieties black teas by the national standard methods. With the content average and single factor variance to analys...

Screening of the agents and antagonistic bacteria to Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliense

"Bacterial soft rot of potato, caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliense(Pcb), is one of the most important diseases in the world. It is widespread and serious in potato producing areas in China and usual...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP602819
  • DOI 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2018.09.012
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jiu-chan LIU, Yu-chuan SUN (2018). Study on soil carbon dioxide, methane flux of growing season in karst hilly area. 广东农业科学, 45(9), 72-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-602819