Świadczenie niegodziwe – trudne dziedzictwo rzymskiej inspiracji

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 72, Issue

Abstract

Incorporating the rules inspired by the Roman condictio ob turpem causam into modern regulations of unjustified enrichment provokes criticism. Such regulations are diversified into several models but mostly invoke controversies. The main goal of this paper is evaluating these critical opinions and doubts repeated in legal discourse using historical and comparative methods. Author focuses on five issues: usefulness of condictio ob turpem causam in the light of works of ius commune jurists; doubts concerning the principle in pari turpitudine melior est conditio possidentis; different approach of various European legislators to the idea of condictio ob turpem causam; relation between regulations of unjustified enrichment and unenforceability of agreements contrary to the o law and good customs; importance of the restitution of payments contrary to the law and good customs for today’s legal practice. The conclusions of such analysis allow to admit that doubts concerning the continuation of the Roman condictio ob turpem causam are justified. From the other side, in times of multicultural societies and increasing number of legal regulations the growth of disputes resulted from the payments contrary to law and good customs can be observed. The rejection of repayment based on the contrary to the objective good faith offers – according to the author – the best compromise between weak points of Roman condictio ob turpem causam and challenges of modern practice. In the legal reasoning it is expressed by the maxime „no one shall be heard, who invokes his own guilt”.Incorporating of this maxime into the unjustified enrichment is all the more justified when higher could be in legal practice doubts concerning the acceptability of rejection of restitution of the payment with has been made without legal ground but in the contrary to the principle of good faith.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Dajczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Wybrane problemy ustawodawstwa antyterrorystycznego w perspektywie historycznej

Terrorism has been threatening modern societies for many decades. Legislative response to this issue includes creating various definitions and classifications of terrorist acts on one hand and introducing „repressive” co...

Teoria wykładni prawa cywilnego według Eugeniusza Waśkowskiego

The article contains the presentation monograph of Eugene Waśkowski (published in 1936) on the theory of interpretation of civil law. Waśkowski is a supporter of the traditional theory of interpretation that favors legal...

Fables of the Reconstruction: Human Emotion and Behavioral Heuristics in Environmental Economics

Polityka środowiskowa jest szczególnie ważnym źródłem poznania wpływu emocji, błędu poznawczego i heurystyki behawioralnej na ocenę ryzyka i zarządzania ryzykiem. W przeciwieństwie do ambiwalentnej percepcji psychologii...

Integration of Agricultural Production in Polish Constitutional System

The essence of the agricultural law is related to agricultural activities and is regulated in private law; whereas public law specifies the aims and conditions of performing these activities. The Stat is obliged to estab...

Protection of the Environment in Times of Non-international Armed Conflicts – a Gap to be Filled in

Environmental protection in times of non-international armed conflicts is not subject to the sectoral or particular protection categories of environmental law and to date it has not been comprehensively regulated by inte...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP345585
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7590
  • Views 57
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Dajczak (2017). Świadczenie niegodziwe – trudne dziedzictwo rzymskiej inspiracji. Studia Iuridica, 72(), 101-119. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-345585