Systems of Selection and Appointment of Judges and the Issue of Judicial Independence: American, English and German Experiences

Journal Title: Białostockie Studia Prawnicze - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue 20

Abstract

Th e article aims to investigate the infl uence of diff erent systems of selection and appointment of judges adopted in the legal systems of the United States, England and Wales, and Germany on judicial independence. In these countries, the following methods are used for the selection of judges: appointment by the executive, appointment by the career or civil service judiciary, shared or parity appointments and appointment by judicial committees. Comparative law analysis shows that the adoption of a particular method for the selection of judges, especially in connection with the term of offi ce, may have an impact on their independence and impartiality. Especially risky seems to be the American justice system, which rooted in the idea of “popular constitutionalism” methods of election and re-election of judges could jeopardize fair trial guarantees. In England and Wales, of great importance in strengthening the independence of the judiciary was the introduction of the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 and the institution of the Supreme Court. In Germany, independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the Constitution and the Constitutional Court. Further observations indicate that both in common and continental law, the universal guarantee of independence of the judiciary is for judges to follow ethical and professional dignity principles.

Authors and Affiliations

Cezary Kulesza

Keywords

Related Articles

Sądowy dział spadku jako nabycie nieruchomości rolnej – wybrane aspekty praktyczne

Distribution of the estate by the court is a form of transferring the ownership of an agricultural property within the meaning of the Agricultural System Structuring Act of 11 April 2003. As a consequence, the court hear...

The Eff ectiveness of Victim-Off ender Mediation in Criminal Proceedings Carried Out in 2011-2014 in the District Court of Białystok in the Light of Files Research

Th is article is based on the results of scientifi c research conducted within the project “Th e pilot implementation of the Community Court model in Poland as an institutional bridge between the judiciary, local governm...

The European Union and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Selected Institutional Aspects of Implementation

The European Union is a party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A broad scope of the UNCRPD provisions makes it covered by diff erent types of EU competence – exclusive and shar...

Promoting the Culture of Lawfulness by Teaching about Transnational Organized Crime

Th e mention of “culture of lawfulness” in the Doha Declaration of the Th irteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (Qatar, 2015) prompted the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime to d...

Well Begun is Half Done: Amendments to the Polish Legal Framework for Consensual Dispute Resolution Needed Aft er Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU)

Th is article concentrates on amendments to the Polish legal framework for consensual dispute resolution that are needed aft er Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU). It starts with the general context of changes in...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342930
  • DOI 10.15290/bsp.2016.20A.09
  • Views 56
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Cezary Kulesza (2016). Systems of Selection and Appointment of Judges and the Issue of Judicial Independence: American, English and German Experiences. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 0(20), 121-132. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342930