Wpływ przyjęcia spadku z dobrodziejstwem inwentarza na przebieg egzekucji sądowej
Journal Title: Białostockie Studia Prawnicze - Year 2017, Vol 0, Issue 22
Abstract
In the case of acceptance of the inheritance bearing the benefi t of inventory, an heir shall be liable for inherited debts only up to the value of the assets of the estate as established in the list of the inventory or the inventory. According to Article 319 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code, if a defendant is liable under specifi c assets or up to the value of such assets, the court may, without specifying the assets or value thereof, uphold an action and allow the defendant to rely on his limited liability in enforcement proceedings. Th e problem of limited liability of heirs who have accepted the inheritance with the favour of the inventory becomes current especially in the situation of the changed legal status introducing as the principle of inheritance with the favour of the inventory. Th e article draws attention to the meaning of such acceptance of the inheritance on the course of enforcement proceeding. It searches for a model of how to implement this law. Th ere are two variants which may be formed as a restriction acting under the enforcement title and taken into account ex offi cio or, as a consequence of an enforceable title, but taken into account on the request or the claim of a debtor exercising that right. According to Article 837 of the Code, a debtor may refer to limited liability, if such limitation is stipulated in an enforcement title. Th e creditor is not obliged to show the amount that is enforceable by the enforceable limitation, but the debtor should demonstrate the grounds and scope of limited liability. Th e conclusions include the assessment of such legal status. Th e second problem raised in the article related to the limited liability of the heirs is the cost of inventory and the possibility of taking it from the inheritance. Th e analysis of the legislation indicates that the decision on what constituents of the estate may take place can only be made by a court and not by a bailiff .
Authors and Affiliations
Paweł Dzienis
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP342005
- DOI 10.15290/bsp.2017.22.04.05
- Views 204
- Downloads 0
Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 6 września 2012 r. (sygn. I ACa 723/12)
Teza: Lekarz nie ma obowiązku informowania o wszystkich możliwych, nawet rzadko występujących powikłaniach
Limitations of Patient’s Right to Self-Determination Due to Hospitalization for Tuberculosis
Th e subject of the article is a discussion of issues related to the limitation of patients’ rights provided for in the law in the prevention and control of one of the infectious diseases – tuberculosis. Th e above restr...
Disciplinary Liability of Legal Advisors and Legal Advisor Trainees in the Face of the Principle of a Fair Trial
Th e legal advisory service is a liberal profession, a profession of public trust. Th e aim of this paper is to analyze the related disciplinary procedure and its specifi cs. Th e disciplinary liability of legal advisors...
Dylematy regulacji dziedziczenia ustawowego dzieci małżonka spadkodawcy (art. 9341 kc.)
Th e circle of statutory heirs cannot be accidental. Th e inclusion into Polish law of children of the deceased’s spouse to this circle is associated with the concept of the legislator to establish a wide range of potent...
Autonomy of Local Self-Governments From a Financial Perspective in Hungary
Recently, there has been a constitutional change related to self-governments in Hungary. The article examines the status of Hungarian local governments in comparison with EU member states from a financial perspective. Au...