Technical comparison between two pretreatment piping compact units for ultrafiltration water plants

Journal Title: Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal - Year 2024, Vol 11, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Ultrafiltration plants are increasingly used for producing high-quality water. The research aimed to compare two compact piping units employed as pretreatment systems to enhance surface water quality. The aim was to achieve the specified average values of feed water quality necessary for ultrafiltration (UF) plants, as per the requirements of the UF manufacturer. The units were intended for use in a water treatment plant with a capacity of 5000 m3/day, where the influent water’s total suspended solids (TSS) ranged from 130 to 160 mg/L. Methods: The initial unit implemented plate settler technology to facilitate sedimentation, whereas the subsequent unit adopted filtration. Both piping systems were assessed for their efficacy in conforming to stipulated water quality standards alongside the corresponding economic considerations. Results: Both piping units effectively achieved the mandated water quality standards, albeit at disparate costs. In this specific case study, the sedimentation units incurred an initial expense of 191 800 Egyptian pounds (LE) (equivalent to $6209.5), whereas the filtration units necessitated an initial investment of 471 680 LE ($15 270.5). Additionally, both the initial outlay and ongoing operational expenses of the sedimentation units were inferior to those of the filtration units. Conclusion: Based on the study results, the use of sedimentation units proved to be more cost-effective. Despite meeting the required water quality standards, the sedimentation units had lower initial and operational costs than the filtration units. Therefore, it is recommended to use sedimentation units as the pretreatment system in this water treatment plant to achieve the desired water quality while optimizing costs.

Authors and Affiliations

Amira Mohamed Nagy, Mohamed ElHosseiny El-Nadi

Keywords

Related Articles

Seasonal variations of heavy metals concentrations and pollution assessment of major dumpsites in Ilisan-Remo, Nigeria

Background: Globally, natural and anthropogenic activities have led to soil pollution resulting in physiological and health challenges on environment, plants, animals, and humans. The present study was conducted to det...

Evaluation of biosurfactant production by Sporosarcina halophila and its application in crude oil remediation

Background: Biosurfactants are valuable microbial products that have significant applications in various industries. The advantages of these compounds are biodegradability, low toxicity, activity in difficult environme...

The relationship between hot spots of air pollution and the incidence of gestational diabetes based on spatial analysis: A study on one of the most air-polluted metropolis of Iran

Background: Despite the serious impacts of air pollution on human health, few studies have focused on the adverse effects of air pollution on pregnancy outcomes based on the geographic information system (GIS) approach...

Evaluation of the presence of coliform in bottled drinking water, released in Sari in 2016

Background: Today, bottled water is used in many countries of the world due to its relatively low cost, better taste, ease of access and low levels of impurities. In unfavorable conditions, the maintenance of microorgani...

Investigation of the relationship between depth of overhang and amount of daylight indicators in office buildings of Kerman city

Background: The use of daylight in offices has become an effective strategy to improve the quality of indoor space and energy efficiency. There is enough potential to have daylight autonomy in Kerman as a city with more...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP746488
  • DOI 10.34172/EHEM.2024.25
  • Views 29
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Amira Mohamed Nagy, Mohamed ElHosseiny El-Nadi (2024). Technical comparison between two pretreatment piping compact units for ultrafiltration water plants. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 11(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-746488