The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small.

Authors and Affiliations

Kimmo Eriksson and Brent Simpson

Keywords

Related Articles

The effects of total sleep deprivation on bayesian updating

Subjects performed a decision task (Grether, 1980) in both a well-rested and experimentally sleep-deprived state. We found two main results: 1) final choice accuracy was unaffected by sleep deprivation, and yet 2) the es...

Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences?

The opportunity to tell a white lie (i.e., a lie that benefits another person) generates a moral conflict between two opposite moral dictates, one pushing towards telling the truth always and the other pushing towards he...

Fast Acceptance by Common Experience: FACE-recognition in Schelling’s model of neighborhood segregation

Schelling (1969, 1971a,b, 1978) observed that macro-level patterns do not necessarily reflect micro-level intentions, desires or goals. In his classic model on neighborhood segregation which initiated a large and influen...

The relationship between cognitive style and political orientation depends on the measures used

The present research investigated the reason for mixed evidence concerning the relationship between analytic cognitive style (ACS) and political orientation in previous research. Most past research operationalized ACS wi...

Decisions under unpredictable losses: An examination of the restated diversification principle

An experimental test of the descriptive adequacy of the restated diversification principle is presented. The principle postulates that risk-averse utility maximizers will pool risks for their mutual benefit, even if info...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678068
  • DOI -
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kimmo Eriksson and Brent Simpson (2013). The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678068