The Challenges of Monoaxial Bone Transport in Orthopedics and Traumatology

Journal Title: Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja - Year 2017, Vol 19, Issue 4

Abstract

Background. Bone defects represent the main challenging problem for the orthopedic surgeon and, consequently, they increase the duration of hospitalization, risk of complications and health expenditures. The aim of our observational, descriptive and retrospective study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with a mo­nolateral external fixator for bone defects greater than 3 cm. Material and methods. Between January 2003 and January 2013, 21 patients were treated at our center by bone transfer with a monolateral external fixator. The main etiologies were trauma in 17 cases (80.9%) and tumors in 4 cases (19.1%). Mean follow-up was 5 years for non-union and 3 years for tumors. Our clinical evaluation was based on ASAMI (Association for the Study ad Application of the Methods of Ilizarov) scores during this follow-up period. Results. The functional outcomes, based on ASAMI scores, were excellent in 12 cases, good in 7 and poor in 2. Conclusion. 1. A review of the literature related to our experience shows that bone transport is an effective tech­nique to repair loss of bone in the lower limbs. The use of a system of external fixation enables corrective actions throughout the treatment that can be in­dividualized on a case-by-case basis. In our experience, the LRS fixator (Orthofix) is a sta­ble, easy-to-use and very handy device. 2. In situations where soft tissue reconstruction procedures are needed, the size and shape of the splint should be such as not to constitute an obstacle. Fur­thermore, the use of pins rather than transfixation wires eliminates the risk of neuro / vascu­lar injury such as may occur during the application of a circular fixator. 3. The analysis of the cases presented here indicates that where possible the technique of bone transport produces good results and can often salvage the limb. Amputation should be reserved only for cases where the general and / or local preoperative status indicate that the surgeon can expect a poor result or when the compliance of the patient is determined to be inadequate.

Authors and Affiliations

Michele Bisaccia, Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Luigi Meccariello, Auro Caraffa, Bartosz Cukierman, Julio Ribes Iborra

Keywords

Related Articles

Femoral insufficiency fractures with bisphosphonate therapy – cases studies

IntroductionThe aim of this paper is to analyze on clinical cases specific features of femoral insufficiency fractures during bisphosphonates therapy. Material and MethodsWe are presenting two insufficiency femoral fract...

Analiza skuteczności przeciwbólowej wybranych metod fizykoterapii u osób z zespołami bólowymi części lędźwiowo – krzyżowej kręgosłupa<br />

Streszczenie:Wstęp: Zespoły bólowe kręgosłupa są jedną z najczęstszych przyczyn ograniczenia aktywności ruchowej populacji krajów uprzemysłowionych. Wymieniane są one jako główny powód niezdolności do pracy osób w wieku...

Wyniki leczenia po jednoczasowej rekonstrukcji więzadła krzyżowego przedniego i plastyce mozaikowej uszkodzeń chrząstki stawowej kolana

Wstęp. Przewlekła niestabilność rotacyjna kolana po uszkodzeniu więzadła krzyżowego przedniego powoduje w nieodległym czasie rozwój wtórnych, niekorzystnych zmian w stawie. Dodatkowe, współistniejące uszkodzenia dotyczą...

Influence of physiotherapy on patients’ quality of life after decompressive surgery of lumbar spine stenosis

SummaryIntroduction. Physiotherapy after lumbar spine stenosis surgery should be an integral process of treatment. It is a process whose goal is patient ‘s return to optimal fitness in the safest way.The aim of this s...

sjdhfjhrfweru

sajdhaskjdhaskdjh

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP222114
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0010.4646
  • Views 56
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michele Bisaccia, Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Luigi Meccariello, Auro Caraffa, Bartosz Cukierman, Julio Ribes Iborra (2017). The Challenges of Monoaxial Bone Transport in Orthopedics and Traumatology. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja, 19(4), 373-378. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-222114