The Constitutionality of Medina Convention

Journal Title: Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 2

Abstract

The Medina Convention, which was signed in the aftermath of Muhammad immigration to Medina, which includes Jews and other Arab tribes in the city, is a subject of much debate over both the theologians and other intellectual groups, also by the western partners. In the assessments made around the convention, evaluations were made that this was a state, even was an Islamic state that was established. The Medina Agreement is an agreement made by the Messenger of Allah in order to ensure the unity of the Muslims and the others in Medina against the Islamic opponents in Mecca, and to declare that he is the head of the administrative order he wants to establish. This agreement was originally made for Muslims only and then extended to include Jews, as can be seen in the details of the contract text and the analysis of the narratives on this subject. Moreover, it is considered that the agreement is a text that appears from the merging of agreements made at different times, not at one time. The agreement was violated by the Jewish Kaynukaogullari Tribe after about a year. In the aftermath of the Badr and Hudaybiye Wars, the Jews attempts to disrupt the agreementended with the deportation of them to other regions of the Arabian Peninsula, thus the provisions under the agreement could not be applied. The Medina contract is in fact a multilateral agreement. The Convention has beendefined by some authors as the Constitutio n and has been considered only as an agreement. However, it should not be ignored the fact that in the preparation of the contract, in the background the understanding of the divine address, by revelation, equity and human values is practiced by Muhammad.

Authors and Affiliations

Murat AKARSU

Keywords

Related Articles

Usability of Yellow Striped Pavements by Visually Handicapped People in Hatay

The most important problem experinced by visually impaired individuals is inadequacy of opportunities and inequality of opportunities with other people. The yellow striped pavement was made to help distance-place-directi...

The “Others” Of Evliya Çelebi The Infidels, The Sinners, The Insects, and The People Nonsecterian In The Book Of Travels (Seyahatnâme)

Evliya Çelebi’s Seyahatnâme is a highly important work reflecting not only the culture of 17th century Ottoman Empire, but also the cultures of Asian, European and African communities which represent the identities of th...

Conservative Modernism: An Assessment Through Sabahattin Zaim's Point of View

Even if definitions and limits of Turkish type of conservatism cannot be defined in a way which is different from the conservatism revealed in the sense of Western, it is a fact that Turkish conservatism also has its own...

Behavioral Finance as a Human Dimension of Finance in the Context of Cognitive Bias and Heuristics: A Literature Review and Compilation Study

There are two basic assumptions of traditional finance theory. These are individuals are rational and aim to maximize their benefits in accordance with the assumptions of expected utility theory. Rational decision making...

Syrian Refugees in the Process of Resettlement: Analyzing Turkey’s Migration Legislation in the Context of Gender

Numbers of Syrians, affected from conflicts had to migrate to Turkey as a result of the Civil War began in 2011. 3.5 millions of those Syrian refugees, who have been forced to be uprooted, settled down in Turkey. In thi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP614325
  • DOI 10.35235/uicd.493825
  • Views 99
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Murat AKARSU (2018). The Constitutionality of Medina Convention. Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 388-396. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-614325