The criminal procedure aspect of differentiating criminal responsibility of the expert and specialist for perjury and conclusions

Journal Title: Юридические науки и образование - Year 2019, Vol 60, Issue 60

Abstract

The establishment of criminal responsibility of the expert and specialist for perjury and knowingly false conclusions is a guarantee of the credibility of the data obtained from them. The differentiation of this responsibility and the determination of the nature of illegal actions of each of the named persons who have special knowledge are only possible through a clear demarcation of their criminal procedure rights and duties. The aim of this work is to identify the criminal procedure conditions for prosecuting the expert and specialist. In the study the authors used the methods of comparative law, historicism, structured system analysis and synthesis. The analysis of the current Russian legislation, the criminal procedure legislation of Germany, which is the most similar to the Russian one in its conceptual framework and case law, shows the need to specify the criminal procedure status of the specialist in order not only to solve a lot of procedural problems of using his special knowledge, but also to ensure the strict differentiation of criminal responsibility of the specialist, expert and witness in case of their perjury during the investigation and in court. The differences in the procedural responsibilities of these persons create the features of the objective and subjective sides of illegal actions committed by them. The article may be useful in the field of legislation, law enforcement and science. The legally provided possibility to prosecute the experts and specialists for knowingly giving false opinions and testimony can be an effective means of ensuring the credibility of the evidence obtained with the use of their special knowledge, but only in case of maximum specification of the procedural status of the expert and specialist, which the current Russian law does not contain.

Authors and Affiliations

Alexander Tarasov, Aliya Sharipova

Keywords

Related Articles

Religion on punishment

The theory of Divine origin of the right to punish seeks the basis of punitive right not in the properties of an individual, but in the conditions of the emergence of human intercourse, in the laws of universe. It requir...

Description of the stages of proving

A stage of proving as the process of ascent from the unit to the whole, must possess certain properties of the whole, a part of which it is, at the same time have properties that distinguish it from the other stages of p...

Cyber security is an integral part of state security

One of the most troubling issues in the globalization era is the issue of security and its provision.It is now possible to note that cyber security is becoming a strategic national issue that affects all levels of govern...

Judicial errors in applying the rules of improper litigating substitution

It is analyzed the problematic issues related to the application of the procedural law concerning the improper litigant substitution in the civil proceedings. The authors consider some aspects related to the interpretati...

Criminalistical description of the murders committed from mercenary motives

It is studied the ways of committing and concealment of murders from mercenary motives; it is considered the problems of feigning of the events, made up their classification. It is analyzed the issues of crime scene, its...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP650935
  • DOI 10.25108/2304-1730-1749.iolr.2019.60.450-466
  • Views 81
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alexander Tarasov, Aliya Sharipova (2019). The criminal procedure aspect of differentiating criminal responsibility of the expert and specialist for perjury and conclusions. Юридические науки и образование, 60(60), 450-466. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-650935