The effects of forward rotation of posture on heavy intensity cycling: Implications of UCI rule 1.3.013
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 3
Abstract
UCI rule 1.3.013 limits the forward displacement of the nose of the saddle to 5cm rearward of the centre of the bottom-bracket. This study tests the effects of contravening this rule on 4km laboratory time trials and highlights biomechanical and physiological responses that could be of interest to coaches and bike fitters. Ten competitive male cyclists age 26±2 (mean±SD) yrs, height 180±5 cm, body mass 71±6 kg; V̇ O2max 70.9±8.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed 4km time trials and heavy intensity bouts. Riding posture was rotated forward where the nose of the saddle was 0, 2, 4, and 6cm to the rear of the bottom bracket (P0, P2, P4 and P6). End time, power, cardiorespiratory responses, lower appendage kinematics and crank torque kinetics were measured. There was no significant effect of position on 4 km time trials completion time or power. During 4 km time trials and heavy intensity bouts, gas exchange variables and lower limb range of motion were unchanged (P>0.05). Trunk lean angle, cardiac output and stroke volume were greater at P6 than other positions (P<0.05). Angular velocity of the hip over top dead centre (350-10°) and the hip peak torque angle were greater at P0 than other positions (P<0.05). Peak and mean torque were unchanged (P>0.05). Results indicate, contravening rule 1.3.013 does not bring about improvements to 4km laboratory TTs. The rearward shift in peak crank torque most likely occurs as a function of altered muscle activation. Haemodynamic variations are possibly related to changes in peripheral resistance at the most forward position. Further work is necessary to allude to probable improvements in aerodynamics.
Authors and Affiliations
Oliver Caddy| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Matthew A Timmis| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Dan Gordon| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2948
- DOI -
- Views 393
- Downloads 19
Agreement Between the Stages Cycling and SRM Powermeter Systems during Field- Based Off-Road Climbing
The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between two portable cycling powermeters for use doing field based mountain biking. A single participant performed 15 timed ascents of an off-road climbs. The particip...
Assessment of Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D Status in Elite Portuguese Cycling Athletes
It is recognized that vitamin D has multiple effects in health (Autier, Boniol et al. 2014) and in athletic performance (Ogan and Pritchett 2013). It has been shown that it may have a role in the immune function, protein...
GPS-Based Evaluation of Activity Profiles in Elite Downhill Mountain Biking and the Influence of Course Type
This study aimed to profile the activity patterns of elite downhill (DH) mountain bikers during off-road descending, and to determine the influence of course types on activity patterns. Six male elite DH mountain bikers...
The analysis & forecasting of British cycling time trial records
Background: The sport of cycling time trials in Great Britain has taken place over several distance or time based formats since 1935. The format of this sport typically involves riders competing individually over several...
Analysis of performances at the ‘Ironman Hawaii triathlon’ and its qualifier events with respect to nationality
Ergometers and stationary bicycle trainers are commonly used in laboratories to simulate overground riding. Missing from such instrumentation, however, is any demand for balance and the fraction of the metabolic cost ass...