The effects of forward rotation of posture on heavy intensity cycling: Implications of UCI rule 1.3.013
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 3
Abstract
UCI rule 1.3.013 limits the forward displacement of the nose of the saddle to 5cm rearward of the centre of the bottom-bracket. This study tests the effects of contravening this rule on 4km laboratory time trials and highlights biomechanical and physiological responses that could be of interest to coaches and bike fitters. Ten competitive male cyclists age 26±2 (mean±SD) yrs, height 180±5 cm, body mass 71±6 kg; V̇ O2max 70.9±8.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed 4km time trials and heavy intensity bouts. Riding posture was rotated forward where the nose of the saddle was 0, 2, 4, and 6cm to the rear of the bottom bracket (P0, P2, P4 and P6). End time, power, cardiorespiratory responses, lower appendage kinematics and crank torque kinetics were measured. There was no significant effect of position on 4 km time trials completion time or power. During 4 km time trials and heavy intensity bouts, gas exchange variables and lower limb range of motion were unchanged (P>0.05). Trunk lean angle, cardiac output and stroke volume were greater at P6 than other positions (P<0.05). Angular velocity of the hip over top dead centre (350-10°) and the hip peak torque angle were greater at P0 than other positions (P<0.05). Peak and mean torque were unchanged (P>0.05). Results indicate, contravening rule 1.3.013 does not bring about improvements to 4km laboratory TTs. The rearward shift in peak crank torque most likely occurs as a function of altered muscle activation. Haemodynamic variations are possibly related to changes in peripheral resistance at the most forward position. Further work is necessary to allude to probable improvements in aerodynamics.
Authors and Affiliations
Oliver Caddy| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Matthew A Timmis| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Dan Gordon| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2948
- DOI -
- Views 389
- Downloads 19
Bike fitting: finding an optimum between performance and overuse injuries prevention? Influence of saddle fore-aft position on pedalling effectiveness
There exists a great range of possibilities offered to cyclists to adjust their equipment. The influence of some bike adjustments as well as the interactions between them on the performance and/or the biomechanics of ped...
Physiological demands of road sprinting in professional and U23 cycling. A pilot study
This pilot study described and compared the power output (absolute, relative to body weight and relative to frontal area) recorded during successful road sprints in professional and under 23 men’s cycling races. The stud...
An analysis of participation and performance by nationality at ‘Ironman Switzerland’ from 1995 to 2011
Triathlon, in particular the ‘Ironman’ distance, has become very popular in the field of ultra-endurance sports. The aim of the present study was to analyse the participation and performances at the ‘Ironman Switzerland’...
Cyclo-cross Performance and Physiological/Psychological parameters
The new models of exercise performance consider both physiological and psychological parameters to better understand the performance (Marcora 2008: Eur J Appl Physiol 104: 929-931). Despite this, to our knowledge, no stu...
An online survey using social media investigating the use of kinesiology type tape and McConnell type tape with clinicians who treat cycling related knee pain
Background: From high profile events such as the Tour De France and the Olympics, it is noticeable that kinesiology type taping (KTT) is used widely within elite cycling for treatment of knee pain. Taping is a clinical t...