The enforcement of judgments of the ECHR: recourse actions, analogy with statutes, and analogy in law

Abstract

The article discusses relevant issues arising in connection with the use of recourse lawsuits based on the enforcement of judgments made by the European Court of Human Rights. Whenever compensation is paid to an applicant, the state can file an action for damages against persons whose guilty actions served as a basis for the ECHR judgment to recover losses suffered by the state budget. The article analyses the law governing recourse actions in this field and focuses on the fact that courts have to take into account the specific nature of judgments made by the European Court of Human Rights when adjudicating relevant disputes. Such judgments cannot be reviewed, reversed, or disregarded by national courts. Recourse claims based on ECHR judgments are very different from recourse actions filed under civil, commercial, administrative or other branches of law. These claims are of an inter-branch nature and are closely related with international legal acts, such as the 1950 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and judgments made by the European Court of Human Rights. As a result, recourse claims involve the use of both ananalogy in law, which, as a rule, has a branch character, and analogy with statutes, relying on international legal principles and norms. Currently, the legal situation develops in such a way that the persons whose acts served as a ground for a judgment of the ECHR do not bear any responsibility, since compensation is paid at the expense of the state budget. Officials of state and judicial bodies do not bear personal responsibility for unlawful decisions, and legal entities and individuals who triggered unlawful actions of officials are not held liable for damages. At the same time, they are in fact complicit in the unlawful actions of officials. The article deals with the issues of regulation of the existing situation based on the principles of the rule of law.

Authors and Affiliations

Evgen Kubko

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative philosophy of law: the problem of conceptualization

The end of XX – beginning of XXI century characterized by the development of compara- tive research undertaken within the various social sciences and humanities. Methodological comparative approaches and relevant subject...

Strategy of development of the Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine for 2017-2026

Strategy of development of the Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine for 2017-2026

Formation of the comparative history of law as a scientific and educational discipline in the second half of XVIII – the first third of XIX centuries

Considered is the formation of the comparative history of law in the context of the general positive teaching on law differentiation idea in the second half of XVIII – the first third of the XIX centuries. The author arg...

Methodological tools of scientific cognition

It’s highlighted in the article that methodology is general scientific phenomenon characteristic of science in general and each science in particular. The article emphasizes that methodology structurally includes the row...

The transformation of the employment contract: the theoretical and practical problems

The article is devoted to the theoretical and practical problems of legal regulation chan- ges in the employment contract. The concept of the employment contract transformation is studied. It is considered as a stage in...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP525463
  • DOI -
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Evgen Kubko (2018). The enforcement of judgments of the ECHR: recourse actions, analogy with statutes, and analogy in law. Правова держава. Щорічник наукових праць (Pravova derzhava), 29(), 35-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-525463