The First Step in Understanding Human Rights
Journal Title: The Journal of Human Rights - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 1
Abstract
The ambiguity of the concept of human is of the main obstacles in understanding human rights. Traditional philosophers take the Aristotelean essentialist approach to define human and claim that such produced definition provides us with a needed basis for the discovery of human rights. In this article, I elaborate on the Platonist and Aristotelian approach to the understanding of human and show how Aristotelian definition of human is neither philosophically sufficient nor practically applicable. Furthermore, such an approach is the root of many misunderstandings of human rights. Next, through criticizing the basis of essentialism, I present an alternative approach for defining human in analytic tradition based on which the “definition of human” is equivalent to the “meaning of the term human.” This approach is both immune to the philosophical flaws of essentialist approach and properly applicable to identify the instances of human.
Authors and Affiliations
Seyed Masoud Mousavi Karimi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP478984
- DOI 10.22096/HR.2018.32209
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Expression under Muslim Legal Traditions of Apostasy and under International Human Rights Law
Developing an approach to integrate religious legal traditions within modern universal values, as expressed through international human rights norms, is an important priority. The paper provides a study on Muslim Legal T...
Relative or Absolute Freedom of Expression as One of Human Rights In Islamic and Western Foundations
Freedom of expression is a human right. Some experts agree with absolute freedom of expression. For them, the freedom of expression makes all options to be heard; the extent of people’s participation to increase, democra...
Human Rights and Armed Conflict: the European Experience
-
Human Rights and Human Cloning
Abstract Some opponents of human cloning regard it as wrong and unethical from a human rights perspective giving some reasons to prove their view. One is that each human being has the right to have his/her own human iden...
Human Rights, Global Trade and Moral Values
Today, immoralities and prevalence of injustice and corruption on the one hand, and dissatisfaction of the world people due to not considering their natural rights on the other hand, show that there are certain problems...