THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE REASONABLENESS OF THE TIME OF A TRIAL
Journal Title: Проблеми законності - Year 2018, Vol 142, Issue 142
Abstract
In the article "the fundamental principles of civil procedure" and " the principles of civil procedural law" are considered as synonyms. They are understood as normatively fixed requirements that reflect the values of civil procedural law, reproduce the standards of fair trial and determine the procedure of a trial. Such requirements should be pursued by the court and other participants of civil procedure because they have general, stable and imperative nature and perform regulatory and interpretative functions in relation to ordinary rules of civil procedural law. The possibility to classify the requirement about "reasonableness of the time of a trial" as an interdisciplinary principle of judicial procedure is called into question because the lack of a unified approach to its regulation. Taking into account the provisions of the current procedural legislation and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the author proposes to interpret this requirement in three ways: 1) as a convention requirement arising from para. 1 art. 6 ECHR; 2) as a requirement for a general time of a trial, which constitutes an indicator of the effectiveness of protection of violated, unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms and interests (p. 10 p. 3 art. 2 CPC); 3) as a requirement for the time limits of procedural actions in specific cases (art. 121 of the CPC). At the same time, as a requirement for a general time of a trial "the reasonableness of the time of a trial" is an evaluative concept. It cannot be understood as a fundamental principle of civil procedure. In its ontological nature, it is a legal axiom that reproduces the ideal model for the administration of justice and considered to be a tool for realization of the task of timely trial.
Authors and Affiliations
Наталья Сакара
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP401518
- DOI 10.21564/2414-990x.142.141022
- Views 84
- Downloads 0
Separatism in the United Europe: old problem with a new face
The focus of this article is the research of the questions, related to the development of separatism in Europe. The prerequisites for the development of the separatist movement within the European integration are analyse...
FAULT IN TORT LAW: MORAL JUSTIFICATION AND MATHEMATICAL EXPLICATION
The article has two main objectives: (1) to reveal why the fault principle is considered to be morally superior to no-fault liability in primitive law; and (2) to find out the essence of fault in modern tort law and then...
Закон о правах детей в Нигерии и права ребенка-инвалида: необходимость или излишество?
Права ребенка закреплены в Законе Нигерии о правах детей 2003 года. В Законе содержатся конкретные положения о правах ребенка-инвалида. Автор статьи подвергает критике актуальность этих положений в свете других законов Н...
The use of legal doctrine in judicial reasoning
This article is primarily concerned with investigating whether and to what extent legal doctrine actually influences judicial decision-making process in Ukraine and others countries. It is concluded that legal doctrine n...
Формирование эколого-правовой науки: ресурсный аспект и проблемы его интеграции
их відносин, визначенням їх самостійності, системних зв’язків, а також місця в еколого-правовій науці. Охарактеризовано основні напрямки та проблеми ідентифікації природоресурсного права, проаналізовано сучасні тенденції...