The Huawei Case and Its Aftermath: a New Test for a New Type of Abuse

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16

Abstract

Competition law sets limits on the exercise of intellectual property rights by dominant companies, namely in cases involving standard essential patents (SEPs). This article will examine the framework for SEP owners’ right to seek an injunction, discussing competitive problems that such situations may cause as well as the solutions adopted by the European Institutions, comparing them with the US and Japanese approach, and finally reflecting upon the opportunity for a new test for a new type of abuse. Although the three legal orders – US, EU and Japan – apply different laws establishing a general presumption against injunctions in SEPs encumbered with FRAND commitments, their goal is the same: to protect the interest of the SEP holder to obtain a remuneration without an abusive recourse to injunctions. I will argue that, in the EU, the Huawei case created a new test for a new type of abuse, improving the comprehensibility and certainty for the companies involved in standardization across Europe and allowing the harmonization of national judicial solutions regarding the seeking of injunctions in the SEPs context. In spite of some uncertainties, the new test clarifies the role that competition rules should play in cases of abuses by SEPs owners.

Authors and Affiliations

Sofia Oliveira Pais

Keywords

Related Articles

Conference on EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its implementation. Uppsala, 13–14 June 2017 (conference report)

On 13–14 June 2017, a two-day conference entitled ‘EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its Implementation’ was held at Uppsala University (Sweden). The c...

The Influence of Economic Theories and Schools on Competition Law in terms of Vertical Agreements

The paper aims at showing the influence and the views espoused by economic theories and schools of economics on competition policy embedded in antitrust law and conducted by competition authorities in the field of vertic...

Energy Security as a Priority for CEE countries. Is the King Naked?

he aim of this article is to assess the implementation process of the EU energy security policy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In the EU, energy security remains a crucial issue for...

Resale Price Maintenance in Poland – Further Steps to Its Liberalization or Stuck in a Status Quo?

Due to the recognition of their positive market effects, the evolving approach to minimum or fixed resale price maintenance (RPM) creates, in many countries, the requirement of analyzing their tru...

Passing-on of Overcharges and the Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE Countries

The article focuses on the concept of passing-on of overcharges and the peculiarities of its regulation by the Damages Directive. The Damages Directive obliges Member States to ensure that the defendant in an action for...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP318383
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.1
  • Views 46
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sofia Oliveira Pais (2017). The Huawei Case and Its Aftermath: a New Test for a New Type of Abuse. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 10(16), 11-31. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-318383