The incidence of renal cancer in Polish National Cancer Registry: is there any epidemiological data we can rely on?

Journal Title: Central European Journal of Urology - Year 2014, Vol 67, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction The Polish National Cancer Registry (KRN) is the most commonly used sources of data on the incidence of cancers including renal cancer in Poland. Until today, the accuracy and completeness of these data has never been verified. Material and methods The aim of this study was to assess the completeness and reliability of data on the incidence of renal cancer published by the KRN. KRN data on newly diagnosed cases of renal cancer in Poland (for the whole country) and separately in subjectively selected provinces between 2009 and 2011 were retrospectively compared to the data received from the National Health Fund (NFZ) on the number of radical and partial nephrectomies performed due to renal cancer in the same time frame and regions. Results The concordance between the analysed two sources of data was 86%. Calculated ratio of the number of cases in the KRN database to number of cases in the NFZ database in selected provinces were as follows: 109% in Lubuskie, 60% in Mazowieckie, 123% in Podkarpackie and 66% in Podlaskie. No significant differences were observed between analyzed years (89% in 2009, 88% in 2010, 82% in 2011). The number of unreported cases of renal cancer in KRN was lower among male patients comparing to female patients (concordance: 78% vs. 72%). Conclusions The incidence of renal cancer published by KRN is underestimated, thus KRN does not seem to be a fully reliable source of epidemiological data. Due to the fact that this data is crucial for the planning of the health policy in Poland, improving urooncological reporting should be a priority for the health system managers.

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Zygmunt Wojcieszak, Sławomir Poletajew, Daniel Rutkowski, Piotr Radziszewski

Keywords

Related Articles

Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay

Introduction We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing pos...

Pelvic lipomatosis: Bladder sparing extirpation of pelvic mass to relieve bladder storage dysfunction symptoms and pelvic pain

Pelvic lipomatosis is a rare benign disease, associated with overgrowth of fat in the perivesical and perirectal area. It is of unknown etiology. We describe a 45–year–old male with pelvic lipomatosis causing bladder sto...

Simultaneous robot assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy; genital tract and paravaginal nerve sparing radical cystectomy; superextended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal Studer pouch reconstruction for bladder cancer: Robotic hat–trick

The case of a simultaneous robotic radical nephroureterectomy, genital tract and paravaginal nerve– sparing robotic radical cystectomy, super–extended pelvic lymph node dissection and intracorporeal Studer pouch construc...

Pattern of prostate cancer presentation among the Egyptian population: A study in a single tertiary care center

Introduction Prostate cancer is a common health problem that in the majority of cases starts to develop at the age of 50 years, reaching its peak at 60–70 years of age. A variation in its incidence and prevalence exists...

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy training for residents: Hospital Universitario La Paz model

Introduction In the last decade, we have seen the advance of laparoscopic surgery in urology. All laparoscopic procedures in our department are performed by staff members and are assisted by a single resident, ensuring r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342834
  • DOI 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art8
  • Views 46
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Piotr Zygmunt Wojcieszak, Sławomir Poletajew, Daniel Rutkowski, Piotr Radziszewski (2014). The incidence of renal cancer in Polish National Cancer Registry: is there any epidemiological data we can rely on?. Central European Journal of Urology, 67(3), 253-256. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342834