THE MONETARY FINE AS A MEANS OF PROCEDURAL COERCION

Journal Title: Право та інновації - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 24

Abstract

Problem setting. The article investigates the practice of applying a monetary fine as a means of procedural coercion. The author draws attention to a number of provisions that must be taken into account by the court when applying the monetary fine in civil proceedings. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The studied problem has been the subject of scientific works of such scientists, as O. G. Bratel, V. V. Komarov, V. I. Tertyshnikov, D. D. Luspenik, M. J. Stefan. Article’s main body. A fine is a monetary penalty, which consists in the recovery of a certain amount of money from the relevant person to the state budget. That is, its content consists in the impact on the property sphere of a person, depriving him of a certain part of the property. The purpose of the fine is to encourage the implementation of the rules established in the court, the conscientious performance of procedural duties, the cessation of abuse of procedural rights and prevent the creation of illegal obstacles in the implementation of legal proceedings. Conclusions and prospects for the development. It is concluded that the behavior of the person concerned can not be a basis for the application of a fine to him as a means of procedural coercion. In this regard, it is stated that the basis for the application of the fine is not the conduct of the person concerned, but its consequences, which have legal significance. The ECHR considers the application of a fine as an interference to the right of a person with respect for property, so article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention is to be applied. Fine within the meaning of the Convention on the operation of the paragraph. 2 article 1 of Protocol 1, which allows Contracting States to control the use of property, in particular in the form of fines. Given the specific circumstances of the case, the fine should strike a fair balance between, on the one hand, the General interest and, on the other, respect for the property rights of the person, so the intervention should not be such as imposing an excessive burden on the person.

Authors and Affiliations

O. V. Rozhnov

Keywords

Related Articles

LIST OF CITIZENS’ RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Problem setting. Article is devoted to the analysis of legal nature and the list of rights based on citizenship of the European Union due to the founded treaties, acts of institutions of the European Union and relevant c...

Pensions in connection with the survivoras In the system of compulsory state social insurance

Problem setting. Ukraine’s desire to join the European Community requires an adequate legal regulation of social security as a state social orientation. However, nowadays, the problem of theoretical and practical content...

IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN CONDITIONS OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

Problem setting. In the economic and social life of Ukraine transformational processes are taking place in recent years characterized using modern innovative approaches, methodologies and technologies, such as Internet o...

ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO LABOR IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EUROINTEGRATION OF UKRAINE

Problem setting. In modern conditions of Ukraine’s development one of the best ways to implement the national interests of the society, and one of the most important public policy issues is the process of joining to the...

SPECIAL MEANS FOR THE PROTECTION OF INVESTORS INTERESTS IN COMMERCIAL LAW

Problem setting. Determining the means of protecting the interests of participants in investment activities by legal instruments of liability in the presence of investment risks that need to be investigated on the exampl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP493532
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

O. V. Rozhnov (2018). THE MONETARY FINE AS A MEANS OF PROCEDURAL COERCION. Право та інновації, 4(24), 84-89. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-493532