The nonsense math effect

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 6

Abstract

Mathematics is a fundamental tool of research. Although potentially applicable in every discipline, the amount of training in mathematics that students typically receive varies greatly between different disciplines. In those disciplines where most researchers do not master mathematics, the use of mathematics may be held in too much awe. To demonstrate this I conducted an online experiment with 200 participants, all of which had experience of reading research reports and a postgraduate degree (in any subject). Participants were presented with the abstracts from two published papers (one in evolutionary anthropology and one in sociology). Based on these abstracts, participants were asked to judge the quality of the research. Either one or the other of the two abstracts was manipulated through the inclusion of an extra sentence taken from a completely unrelated paper and presenting an equation that made no sense in the context. The abstract that included the meaningless mathematics tended to be judged of higher quality. However, this "nonsense math effect" was not found among participants with degrees in mathematics, science, technology or medicine.

Authors and Affiliations

Kimmo Eriksson

Keywords

Related Articles

New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis.

Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative d...

Is variety the spice of life? It all depends on the rate of consumption

Is variety of the spice of life? The present research suggests that the answer depends on the rate of consumption. In three experiments, we find that, whereas a variety of stimuli is preferred to repetition of even a bet...

Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit”

I raise a methodological concern regarding the study performed by Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler & Fugelsang (2015), in which they used randomly generated, but syntactically correct, statements that were rated for prof...

Inferring uncertainty from interval estimates: Effects of alpha level and numeracy

Interval estimates are commonly used to descriptively communicate the degree of uncertainty in numerical values. Conventionally, low alpha levels (e.g., .05) ensure a high probability of capturing the target value betwee...

Memory retrieval processes help explain the incumbency advantage

Voters prefer political candidates who are currently in office (incumbents) over new candidates (challengers). Using the premise of query theory (Johnson, Häubl & Keinan, 2007), we clarify the underlying cognitive mechan...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678031
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kimmo Eriksson (2012). The nonsense math effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678031