The ontological and moral significance of persons

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Many debates in arenas such as bioethics turn on questions regarding the moral status of human beings at various stages of biological development or decline. It is often argued that a human being possesses a fundamental and inviolable moral status insofar as she is a “person”; yet, it is contested whether all or only human beings count as persons. Perhaps there are non-human person, and perhaps not every human being satisfies the definitional criteria for being a person. A further question, which will be the primary focus of this paper, concerns what essential features of personhood endow persons, human or otherwise, with their moral status and the inherent rights they concomitantly possess. A survey of the history of philosophical theorizing on what it means to be a person yields a broad consensus upon the key capacities being rational thought, self-consciousness, and autonomous volition. It is not sufficient, however, simply to cite these capacities, but to explain why these particular capacities bear moral import. A more recent concern has developed regarding the possible future existence of so-called “post-persons” who, due to their enhanced cognitive and emotive capacities, may be morally superior to mere persons and thereby possess a higher moral status. This paper will conclude with an analysis of the extent to which this concern is warranted.

Authors and Affiliations

Jason T. Eberl

Keywords

Related Articles

La relación trascendental aplicada a la relación alma y cuerpo en el hombre

The transcendental relationship applied to the relationship soul and body in man My goal is to analyse, first, the meaning of the category of the relationship, ac­cording to the concepts contained in the DM 47 over the...

Modeling Mystery

The practice of model-building is very common in analytic philosophical theology. Yet many other theologians worry that any attempt to model God must be hubristic and idolatrous. A better understanding of scientific mode...

Spór o możliwość wykrywania projektu w naukach przyrodniczych

Controversy over the possibility of detecting design in natural sciences According to intelligent design theory, certain biological and cosmic phenomena are designed by an intelligent being and this design is scientific...

On a productive dialogue between religion and science

Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pra...

Czy współczesne nauki przyrodnicze mogą inspirować filozoficzny i teologiczny namysł nad przyczynowością?

Współpraca nauk szczegółowych, filozofii i teologii w analizie relacji i zależności przyczynowych bytów we wszechświecie wydaje się słuszna i uprawniona. Okazuje się jednak, że w praktyce rodzi ona często pewne napięcia,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP327444
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.016
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jason T. Eberl (2017). The ontological and moral significance of persons. Scientia et Fides, 5(2), 217-236. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-327444