The Relationship between Participant Self-Evaluation, Coach Competence, Participant Tasks Achievement and Participant Potential after Underwriting Boccia Training Program

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the Relationship Between Participant Self-Evaluation, Coach Competence, Participant Tasks Achievement and Participant Potential After Underwriting Boccia Training Program. The type of research used in this research is quantitative descriptive research. The quantitative descriptive method is a quantitative research in which the form of description is numerical (statistical). This means that the research is related to the description with statistical numbers. This study used the SOAP-M model to analyze the evaluation of the Boccia training program. In the meta-analysis, researchers examined the relationship between self-evaluation, trainer competence, and achievement with the potential of participants after undergoing the Boccia training program. The results of the meta-analysis showed that self-evaluation, others (trainer competence), and achievement (achievement of participants' tasks in training) simultaneously affect the potential accuracy skills of throw boccia with a positive regression coefficient value. This means that self-evaluation, others (trainer competence), and achievement (achievement of participants' tasks in training) together have a positive impact on the potential of throw boccia accuracy skills in the boccia training program. This also shows that if self-evaluation, others (trainer competence), and achievement (achievement of participants' tasks in training) increase, then there is an increase in the potential of throw boccia accuracy skills and vice versa if it decreases then there is a decrease in the potential of throw boccia accuracy skills in the boccia training program. The results of the coefficient of determination test show that 93.5% of the potential of throw boccia accuracy skills can be explained by variations in self-evaluation, others (trainer competence), and achievement. The remaining 6.5% was explained by other causes outside the study variables. Of the 93.5%, 33.6% of the variation of potential participants is determined by self-evaluation, 32.0% of the variation of potential participants is determined by others (trainer competence), and 27.9% of potential participant variation is determined by achievement. Thus, self-evaluation has a more dominant influence on potential participants than other variables (trainer competence) and achievement.

Authors and Affiliations

Saddan Pramana Putra, Rony Syaifullah, Islahuzzaman Nuryadin, Slamet Riyadi

Keywords

Related Articles

Gender Differences in Mental Health of International Graduate Students

The study investigated the mental health concerns, mental health states, and help-seeking behaviors of international graduate students by gender. Ninety-two respondents accomplished an online survey. The males’ main conc...

Use of Online Resources for Teaching Learning Process in NEP

An effective teaching and learning process is the key to the dissemination of knowledge. In this age of abundance of information, effective teaching is developmental and dynamic. Teaching learning process is no longer pa...

Effectiveness of the Mini Note Use on Mother Pain Perception in Facing Labor Pain in South Tangerang Region Indonesia

Labor pain is a physiological process, but it can cause frustration and despair, so that some mothers worry that they will not be able to get through the labor process. Mini Note was designed as a mini guide book that he...

Strategies for Facing Implementation Challenges Independent Learning Curriculum in Subjects Physical Education, Sports and Health in SMAN6 Yogyakarta

Background: This research aims to present the results of an analysis of the strategies used to face the challenges of implementing the independent learning curriculum in Physical Education, Sports and Health subjects in...

The Impact of Achieving the Objectives of the Overall Safety Policy on Economic Development in Palestine

The primary objective of macro prudential policy is to contain systemic risks or large-scale financial instability . Therefore, the systemic risk can definition will be as “the risk that financial instability will spread...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP721164
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i9-58
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Saddan Pramana Putra, Rony Syaifullah, Islahuzzaman Nuryadin, Slamet Riyadi (2023). The Relationship between Participant Self-Evaluation, Coach Competence, Participant Tasks Achievement and Participant Potential after Underwriting Boccia Training Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(09), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-721164