The role of a court expert opinion in medical proceedings in the light of judicial decision of the Polish courts

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2015, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

Evidencing in medical trials for damages is difficult, and it requires not only knowledge in the field of law, but also in the field of medicine. The main impediment to fluent proceeding in medical matters which requires to be strongly emphasised is a vast difficulty for courts in taking evidence by an expert within reasonable time. Such evidence is generally necessary in every case because there is a necessity to learn medical facts from the perspective of specialist knowledge (Article 278 § 1 of CPC). The problematic nature of damages for so called medical errors has gained more and more significance, both because of the growing number of claims and the damages paid in relation thereto and the rising costs of insurance against those events incurred by healthcare centers. In such legal circumstances, it is worth indicating the extent to which the evidence by an expert doctor is taken in medical proceedings and the significance thereof for a proper course of the proceedings. Nevertheless, frequently opinions by experts are rather far from being objective. Often, as a result of falsely interpreted solidarity of representatives of the profession, experts disregard the lack of knowledge and diligence of a doctor and the organisational omissions in health care centers. Their opinions are very often unclear, ambiguous, posing different hypotheses and the possibilities of damage which do not assist the court in properly assessing the events in matters for compensation. Because of that, a higher standard of conduct for expert doctors should be considered, the manner in which they are appointed and an improvement of the effectiveness of their work.

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Studzińska

Keywords

Related Articles

[b]Ustalanie wydatków konsumpcyjnych podatnika w postępowaniu podatkowym prowadzonym w sprawie opodatkowania dochodów nieujawnionych[/b]

W trakcie postępowań podatkowych prowadzonych w sprawach opodatkowania dochodów nieujawnionych organy podatkowe niekiedy stosują instytucję oszacowania podstawy opodatkowania, aby ustalić wysokość podstawowych wydatków k...

Proposals for the Taxation of a Significant Digital Presence in the European Union

The author is searching for an answer to the question of whether the European Union needs own solutions in the area of taxation of digital economy and whether the solution offered by the European Commission, which is tax...

[b]Triad of Legal Norms Regulating the Process of Providing Incentives to Entrepreneurs in Tax Payment[/b]

The purpose of this paper is to present the legal and financial conditions affecting incentives to Polish entrepreneurs since Poland’s accession to the European Union and before. The paper considers the effects of the Eu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP79274
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.94
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna Studzińska (2015). The role of a court expert opinion in medical proceedings in the light of judicial decision of the Polish courts. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 7(1), 465-496. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-79274