The Role of Coping in Salespeople’s Satisfaction and Its Effect on Salespeople’s Ethics

Journal Title: Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL) - Year 2019, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Stress affects the health of salespeople on a regular basis. It is a weapon of mass destruction as three out of every four workes all over the world consider their work as stressful. It contributes to over 100,000 deaths every year. Thus, it is resulting in becoming a very important topic to study. As salespeople deal with different roles in their daily job and experience role ambiguity, role conflict and role overload, they are subjected to stress more than other employees of any company do. In this paper, I test the hypothesis that different ways of coping have a different influence on job satisfaction and life satisfaction of salespeople. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on the extent to which coping may enhance sales people’s job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Based on data collected from 471 salespeople in the US, I conclude that those salespeople that use the right form of coping will end up enhancing job satisfaction and life satisfaction. My model reveals that the efficient form of coping has a major influence in enhancing job satisfaction. A great way to deal with these negative outcomes of sales job is to cope with the stress on a regular basis. Salespeople who take a positive approach or also called a problem-focused approach tend to deal with the stress in much better form; they attack the root cause of it and tend to increase job satisfaction and life satisfaction. While those who take a negative approach or an emotion-focused approach, tend to show a negative effect of stress and display a lower incidence of job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Employees of the companies and especially managers need to be educated on these topics so that when problems arise, they will be prepared to handle them in a manner that will maximize the organization’s productivity and reduce stress. The employees should be taught to cope with stress in a positive manner and should be taught to take a problem-focused approach to coping.

Authors and Affiliations

Rajesh V. Srivastava

Keywords

Related Articles

Leadership Styles as a Challenge to Generate Innovation Environments in the Companies of the 21st Century

The current challenge for the survival and growth of companies is the appropriation of innovation in all its senses, the generation of propitiating environments and the innovation philosophy acquisition into action; li...

Volkswagen Emission Scandal and Corporate Social Responsibility - A Case Study

Corporate social responsibility plays a high-profile role in today’s competitive market and any unethical behavior done by a corporate leads to objectionable consequences. These consequences often have an influence on bu...

Measuring Efficiency of Financial Support in Lifelong Learning System: A Case Study of Ukrainian Regions

The development of a quality lifelong learning system (LLLS) provides the possibility of obtaining education of various forms (institutional, individual, dual), levels (pre-school, full secondary education, higher educat...

Relationship of Corporate Governance and Efficiency of Selected Public and Private Sector Banks in India

The business of banks runs on the public faith and their confidence in banks. The confidence level of the public can only be developed by proper disclosures and transparency. The good corporate governance practices ensur...

The Examination of the Appearance of CSR in On-line Scientific Databases

The phrase, corporate social responsibility (or CSR) has become very popular in recent years. A lot of definitions are in the literature. There is no generally agreed definition of corporate social responsibility (or CSR...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP502257
  • DOI 10.21272/bel.3(1).118-123.2019
  • Views 133
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rajesh V. Srivastava (2019). The Role of Coping in Salespeople’s Satisfaction and Its Effect on Salespeople’s Ethics. Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL), 3(1), 118-123. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-502257