The Role of Coping in Salespeople’s Satisfaction and Its Effect on Salespeople’s Ethics

Journal Title: Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL) - Year 2019, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Stress affects the health of salespeople on a regular basis. It is a weapon of mass destruction as three out of every four workes all over the world consider their work as stressful. It contributes to over 100,000 deaths every year. Thus, it is resulting in becoming a very important topic to study. As salespeople deal with different roles in their daily job and experience role ambiguity, role conflict and role overload, they are subjected to stress more than other employees of any company do. In this paper, I test the hypothesis that different ways of coping have a different influence on job satisfaction and life satisfaction of salespeople. This paper develops a theoretical model that focuses on the extent to which coping may enhance sales people’s job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Based on data collected from 471 salespeople in the US, I conclude that those salespeople that use the right form of coping will end up enhancing job satisfaction and life satisfaction. My model reveals that the efficient form of coping has a major influence in enhancing job satisfaction. A great way to deal with these negative outcomes of sales job is to cope with the stress on a regular basis. Salespeople who take a positive approach or also called a problem-focused approach tend to deal with the stress in much better form; they attack the root cause of it and tend to increase job satisfaction and life satisfaction. While those who take a negative approach or an emotion-focused approach, tend to show a negative effect of stress and display a lower incidence of job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Employees of the companies and especially managers need to be educated on these topics so that when problems arise, they will be prepared to handle them in a manner that will maximize the organization’s productivity and reduce stress. The employees should be taught to cope with stress in a positive manner and should be taught to take a problem-focused approach to coping.

Authors and Affiliations

Rajesh V. Srivastava

Keywords

Related Articles

Personal and Social Perception of Occupational Hazards by Health Care Workers: A Study among Radiographers

This descriptive research has been undertaken in Tirunelveli city, Tamilnadu with the objectives of understanding the perception of the radiographers working in private multi-specialty hospitals. The study has sampled 60...

A Humanistic Model for the Higher Education Excellence: Embedding Confucianism and Islamic Principles

Both Confucianism and Islam offer a humanistic approach towards the concept of leadership, emphasizing ethical practices such as integrity, trust, moral characters, and justice. They are perceived as a means of providing...

Central bank transparency: cross-country comprehension (example of inflation reports)

Implementation of inflation targeting strategy by the central bank is connected with the public announcement of inflation targets and central bank’s obligation to achieve these goals. The main element of the central bank...

Humanistic – Behavioral – Cultural Competitive Advantage of the Enterprises – Concept Models

The functioning of any organization, including business, is based on people thanks to whom you can shape the competitiveness and competitive advantage. Managers and subordinates are to work together for the good of the e...

The Examination of Appearance of Income Inequality in Scientific Databases with Content Analysis

Our modern world society applies widely – but not nearly in generally – the principle that all human beings are equal, or at least should be equal. There used to be and still are societies heavily burdened by inequalitie...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP502257
  • DOI 10.21272/bel.3(1).118-123.2019
  • Views 170
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rajesh V. Srivastava (2019). The Role of Coping in Salespeople’s Satisfaction and Its Effect on Salespeople’s Ethics. Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL), 3(1), 118-123. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-502257