THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTING RIGHTS IN COMPARATIVE LAW

Abstract

The most important consequence of owning shares in a company is the possibility to exercise your voting right as a shareholder and decide the future of the company and of your own capital increases. Nowadays, companies are becoming increasing interested in knowing the identity and the financial reputation of their shareholders in order to ensure a healthy and stable economic flow. Although Romanian legislation provides minimum quorum and majority guidelines for approving shareholders' decisions, the procedural manner in which shareholders exercise their voting rights may benefit to some extent from the solutions identified by other legal systems, which have a clearer regulation of minority and majority shareholders rights. Also, the discrepancies due to the absence of a more standardized legal framework for the exercise of voting rights have been overcome as a result of the interpretation provided through case law, which has revealed a series of criteria for determining whether the stockholder's vote has been duly cast. Considering the current Romanian legal background, this article aims to analyze the Romanian legal system with respect to the shareholders' voting rights in comparison with the guidelines set out by other legal systems and to emphasize the welcoming recent EU legislation for the harmonization and protection of shareholders' rights.

Authors and Affiliations

Roxana - Mihaela CATEA

Keywords

Related Articles

THE LEGAL REGIME OF UNFAIR CLAUSES IN COMPARATIVE LAW

The concept of unfair clauses has legitimately held the headlines in recent European case law and its relevance is due to the innovative case law solutions and due to the increasing volume of legal contractual relationsh...

PARTICULARITIES ON THE REGULATION OF THE SUE PETITION, IN THE LIGHT OF PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES AND LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

According to the Romanian Civil Procedure Code, one of the trial stages of first instance is represented by the written stage in which, as a general rule, the fulfillment of the requirements regarding the petition conten...

THE HYSTORICAL, PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL FUNDAMENTALS OF COMBATING UNFAIR COMPETITION

Unfair competition is abuse. It is abuse against freedom of competition. Abuse against freedom of initiative and freedom of commerce. Who shall obey the laws of honour and probity? Who has the obligation to do it? Fair b...

ASPECTS REGARDING THE TERMINATION OF THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS

The final cessation of the legal effects of administrative acts can be achieved by annulment and revocation. Both are legal operations that lead to the termination of legal effects of administrative acts. A controversial...

HEREDITARY AND SOCIAL FACTORS OF DRUG USE

The child acquires through education norms, values, models that then manifest as personal choices in his behaviour. The formation and development of human personality is therefore an oriented, organized process award thr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP584511
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Roxana - Mihaela CATEA (2019). THE SHAREHOLDERS VOTING RIGHTS IN COMPARATIVE LAW. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 256-260. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-584511