The value a priori and value-being in Max Scheler’s material ethics of value

Abstract

Scheler called “material ethics of value” his own phenomenological ethics. Therefore, to clarify the concept of “value” is the most important step for a good understanding of his phenomenological material ethics of value. In the whole framework of the phenomenological movement, many phenomeno-ogists such as Husserl, Scheler, and N. Hartmann and so on developed their own ethics of value. But we can see the fundamental difference between Husserl’s or Hartmann’s ethics of value and Scheler’s one. The reason for this is that they prescribed “value” differently. In Scheler’s phenomenological material ethics of value, there are two basic formulations of value: the former is the value a priori as material a priori (more exactly, the relevant priori feeling), and the latter, the value being as a ultimately basic form of being (such a value-being is as basic as Dasein and Sosein, and by it, Scheler refuted Heidegger’s question on value being in advance). On the one hand, in contrast with Husserl, Scheler regarded value a priori as primal-phenomenon; On the other hand, unlike N. Hartmann, Scheler prescribed value-being as “the relative being of act”. In this sense, Scheler’s phenomenological material ethics of value is founded neither merely on the value a priori in the sense of thing-phenomenology, nor merely on emotional a priori in the sense of the act-phenomenology, but on a “material apriorism”. There are three kinds of a priori in such a “material apriorism”: value a priori, emotional a priori and the relevant a priori between fact and act.

Authors and Affiliations

Wei Zhang

Keywords

Related Articles

Towards a Rediscovery of Classical Values: The Ethics of the British Idealists. A Passport across Cultural Borders

William Sweet, ed., The Moral, Social and Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2009

Art and the Riddle of Being

Karsten Harries, A Critical Commentary on Heidegger’s “The Origin of the Work of Art. Springer: 2009

On the Uncanny Subjectivity of Art

A critical phenomenology is paired with qualitative data in order to understand the character of subjective experiences of uncanniness through the encounter with art. We are confronted by art as the beings we have been,...

Perdus dans la translation. La dérive de la notion de « citoyenneté européenne »

This paper focuses on the translation from the classical concept of “citizenship” to the “European citizenship” and tries to describe the consistence of the mutation, ending by sustaining that having the same manner of n...

La Mystagogie de Saint Maxime le Confesseur

Maximi Confessoris, Mystagogia: una cum Latina interpretatione Anastasii Bibliothecarii, edita a Christian Boudignon, Turnhout: Brepols, Corpus Christianorum. Series Graeca, nr. 69, 2011, 187 + 99 p.

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP118813
  • DOI -
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wei Zhang (2010). The value a priori and value-being in Max Scheler’s material ethics of value. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, 2(1), 178-194. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-118813