The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 3
Abstract
Abstract: In social interaction, the facial expression of an opponent contains information that may influence the interaction. We asked whether facial expression affects decision-making in the ultimatum game. In this two-person game, the proposer divides a sum of money into two parts, one for each player, and then the responder decides whether to accept the offer or reject it. Rejection means that neither player gets any money. Results of a large-sample study support our hypothesis that offers from proposers with a smiling facial expression are more often accepted, compared to a neutral facial expression. Moreover, we found lower acceptance rates for offers from proposers with an angry facial expression.
Authors and Affiliations
Patrick Mussel, Anja S. Göritz and Johannes Hewig
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678065
- DOI -
- Views 138
- Downloads 0
A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration
Impaired decision behavior has been repeatedly observed in schizophrenia patients. We investigated several cognitive mechanisms that might contribute to the jumping-to-conclusions bias (JTC) seen in schizophrenia patient...
A new test of the risk-reward heuristic
Risk and reward are negatively correlated in a wide variety of environments, and in many cases this trade off approximates a fair bet. Pleskac and Hertwig (2014) recently proposed that people have internalized this relat...
Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?
Prior studies have found that subjects prefer an improving sequence of income over a constant sequence, even if the constant sequence offers a larger present-discounted value. However, little is known about how these pre...
"Head versus heart": Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns
Most American respondents give "irrational," magical responses in a variety of situations that exemplify the sympathetic magical laws of similarity and contagion. In most of these cases, respondents are aware that their...
Normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting
When making decisions that involve tradeoffs between the quality and timing of desirable outcomes, people consistently discount the value of future outcomes. A puzzling finding regarding such decisions is the extremely h...