New tests of cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic: Probability-outcome tradeoff with branch splitting

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 4

Abstract

Previous tests of cumulative prospect theory (CPT) and of the priority heuristic (PH) found evidence contradicting these two models of risky decision making. However, those tests were criticized because they had characteristics that might “trigger” use of other heuristics. This paper presents new tests that avoid those characteristics. Expected values of the gambles are nearly equal in each choice. In addition, if a person followed expected value (EV), expected utility (EU), CPT, or PH in these tests, she would shift her preferences in the same direction as shifts in EV or EU. In contrast, the transfer of attention exchange model (TAX) and a similarity model predict that people will reverse preferences in the opposite direction. Results contradict the PH, even when PH is modified to include a preliminary similarity evaluation using the PH parameters. New tests of probability-consequence interaction were also conducted. Strong interactions were observed, contrary to PH. These results add to the growing bodies of evidence showing that neither CPT nor PH is an accurate description of risky decision making.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael H. Birnbaum

Keywords

Related Articles

Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard

We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...

Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type

This study examined framing effects in decisions concerning public health. Tversky and Kahneman’s famous Asian Disease Problem served as experimental paradigm. Subjects chose between a sure and a risky option either pres...

What lies beneath? Fear vs. disgust as affective predictors of absolutist opposition to genetically modified food and other new technologies

In line with earlier research, a multi-phase study found a significant positive association between a widely used measure of trait disgust and people’s tendency to favor absolutist (non-consequentialist) restrictions on...

New tests of cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic: Probability-outcome tradeoff with branch splitting

Previous tests of cumulative prospect theory (CPT) and of the priority heuristic (PH) found evidence contradicting these two models of risky decision making. However, those tests were criticized because they had characte...

Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America

As individuals from different nations increasingly interact with each other, research on national in-group favoritism becomes particularly vital. In a cross-national, large-scale study (N = 915) including representative...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677623
  • DOI -
  • Views 154
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael H. Birnbaum (2008). New tests of cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic: Probability-outcome tradeoff with branch splitting. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677623