Cooperative preferences fluctuate across the menstrual cycle

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5

Abstract

Social Value Orientation (SVO) refers to an individual’s preference for the division of resources between the self and another person. Since evidence suggests that hormones influence several facets of human social behavior, we asked whether SVO might fluctuate across the female menstrual cycle. Using self-report data obtained in two independent online studies, we show that cooperative preferences, as indexed by SVO, are indeed significantly more prosocial in the early follicular compared to the midluteal phase in naturally ovulating women. Furthermore, when estimating hormonal variations from norm data, we found estradiol, but not progesterone or testosterone, to be a significant predictor of SVO across the menstrual cycle in both studies, with a negative correlation. Our findings provide evidence that the willingness to cooperate varies across the natural female menstrual cycle and highlight the potential of investigating psychological effects of ovarian sex hormones.

Authors and Affiliations

Christine Anderl, Tim Hahn, Karolien Notebaert, Claudia Klotz, Barbara Rutter and Sabine Windmann

Keywords

Related Articles

Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges

Ubiquitous cognitive biases hinder optimal decision making. Recent calls to assist decision makers in mitigating these biases—via interventions commonly called “nudges”—have been criticized as infringing upon individual...

The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals

Predictions of magnitudes (costs, durations, environmental events) are often given as uncertainty intervals (ranges). When are such forecasts judged to be correct? We report results of four experiments showing that forec...

Cultural differences in risk: The group facilitation effect

We compared South Koreans with Australians in order to characterize cultural differences in attitudes and choices regarding risk, at both the individual and group levels. Our results showed that Australians, when assesse...

Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination

In a highly uncertain world, individuals often have to make decisions in situations with incomplete information. We investigated in three experiments how partial cue information is treated in complex probabilistic infere...

Coherence and correspondence in medicine

Many controversies in medical science can be framed as tension between a coherence approach (which seeks logic and explanation) and a correspondence approach (which emphasizes empirical correctness). In many instances, a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678192
  • DOI -
  • Views 117
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christine Anderl, Tim Hahn, Karolien Notebaert, Claudia Klotz, Barbara Rutter and Sabine Windmann (2015). Cooperative preferences fluctuate across the menstrual cycle. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678192