THE VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF WH-ADJUNCTS WITHIN ISLAND STRUCTURES IN TURKISH

Journal Title: The Journal of International Social Research - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 46

Abstract

The interpretation of the reason and purpose denoting wh-adverbials in Turkish, neden, niye, niçin ‘why’ are always problematic within syntactic islands (Arslan, 1999, Görgülü, 2006, Çakır, 2015; 2016). Reinhart (1998) focuses on the different behaviors of the wh-adverbials ‘why e.g.’ and which-NP constructions ‘which student e.g.’ in-situ and proposes a choice-function analysis for them. Following her claims, Arslan (1999) proposes that wh-adverbials niye, neden, niçin 'why' cannot be interpreted within syntactic islands in Turkish while the interpretation of the which-NP constructions like hangi amaçla ‘for what reason’ or hangi sebeple ‘with what purpose’ in such structures are possible since they dominate an N-set from which an individual can be selected. These wh-adverbials, in fact, underwent a phonological attrition process and lost some of their phonetic substances: ne + için = niçin, ne+diye = niye, ne+ABL= neden. The full forms of these wh-expressions can be viewed as wh-pronominals within postpositional phrases whose noun sets are empty. Hence, the use of ne için ‘for what’ instead of niçin ‘why’ within island structures might produce more acceptable results. In the present study, the characteristics of different types of wh-adjuncts in Turkish are analyzed through a grammaticality judgment test and a missing word completion task. The findings of the study indicate that all wh-adjuncts do not behave similarly: the acceptability of wh-adverbials, wh-pronominals in postpositional phrases and which-NP constructions differ from one another, which shed light on the adjunct & argument asymmetry observed in Turkish. The syntactic explanations for the variation in the acceptability of different types of wh-adjuncts have been presented in the study as well.

Authors and Affiliations

Sinan ÇAKIR

Keywords

Related Articles

The Roles of Private Higher Educational Institutions in Promoting Formal Lifelong Education in Malaysia

One manifestation of globalisation is that countries are more integrated socially, politically, economically and technologically. The pressures of new knowledge and skills are challenging traditional higher education sys...

WRITTEN EXPRESSION SKILLS OF FOREIGN STUDENTS: KARAMAN SAMPLE

The aim of this study, which analyzes Turkish written expression skills of the students learning Turkish as foreign language in Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, is to determine the mistakes they make and offer suggestio...

ON THE SYMBOLS OF JONAH AND DOLPHIN IN BYZANTINE ART

In this article dolphin figure which used as a religious symbol and the story of Jonah after the Christianity are adressed. The processing and meaning of the dolphin figure which converted to Christian symbol are investi...

THE ORNAMENTS OF MİLAS FİRUZ BEY MOSQUE

The Architecture of Beyliks Period, which is considered as a separate period in the history of Turkish architecture, is almost a bridge between Seljuk and Ottoman architects. The Seljuk State which was founded in Anatoli...

A SWOT ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE RURAL TOURISM POTENTIAL OF MUGLA/ORTACA DISTRICT

Rural tourism is seen as an important option in recent years for the tourists whose seek alternative instead of classical holiday concept including sea-sand-sun. From this viewpoint, it is matter to determine and analyse...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252625
  • DOI 10.17719/jisr.20164622573
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sinan ÇAKIR (2016). THE VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF WH-ADJUNCTS WITHIN ISLAND STRUCTURES IN TURKISH. The Journal of International Social Research, 9(46), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252625