THE VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF WH-ADJUNCTS WITHIN ISLAND STRUCTURES IN TURKISH
Journal Title: The Journal of International Social Research - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 46
Abstract
The interpretation of the reason and purpose denoting wh-adverbials in Turkish, neden, niye, niçin ‘why’ are always problematic within syntactic islands (Arslan, 1999, Görgülü, 2006, Çakır, 2015; 2016). Reinhart (1998) focuses on the different behaviors of the wh-adverbials ‘why e.g.’ and which-NP constructions ‘which student e.g.’ in-situ and proposes a choice-function analysis for them. Following her claims, Arslan (1999) proposes that wh-adverbials niye, neden, niçin 'why' cannot be interpreted within syntactic islands in Turkish while the interpretation of the which-NP constructions like hangi amaçla ‘for what reason’ or hangi sebeple ‘with what purpose’ in such structures are possible since they dominate an N-set from which an individual can be selected. These wh-adverbials, in fact, underwent a phonological attrition process and lost some of their phonetic substances: ne + için = niçin, ne+diye = niye, ne+ABL= neden. The full forms of these wh-expressions can be viewed as wh-pronominals within postpositional phrases whose noun sets are empty. Hence, the use of ne için ‘for what’ instead of niçin ‘why’ within island structures might produce more acceptable results. In the present study, the characteristics of different types of wh-adjuncts in Turkish are analyzed through a grammaticality judgment test and a missing word completion task. The findings of the study indicate that all wh-adjuncts do not behave similarly: the acceptability of wh-adverbials, wh-pronominals in postpositional phrases and which-NP constructions differ from one another, which shed light on the adjunct & argument asymmetry observed in Turkish. The syntactic explanations for the variation in the acceptability of different types of wh-adjuncts have been presented in the study as well.
Authors and Affiliations
Sinan ÇAKIR
THE EFFECT’S OF MANEGER’S COMMUNICATION FEAR ON THE ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION PROCESS
Communication is processes of perception and in this process, the fears of the manager occur as a factor affecting the meaning of the message and a block for the process of communication. In this study, the breakdown of...
RELATED TO "IN CIVIL SOCIETY WOMEN AND WOMEN MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS" OF ADMINISTRATOR WOMEN IN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
It is important to define the problems and solutions proposal that female managers in sivil society experience while they are working. The study has been made with interwiev method of qualitative research methods and six...
(M. ŞEMSETTİN GÜNALTAY’S LİFE, AND SCIENTIFIC, ADMINISTRATİVE AND POLITICAL ACTIVITIİES)
M. Şemsettin Günaltay was a man of science, thought and politics who strived to find a solution and made great strides towards the liberation of the country in a time of distress. He was elected to the parliament as the...
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH FOR COMPUTER ETHICS WITH EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES EXPERTS
It was aimed to determine opinions of educational technologies experts about problems of computer ethics in terms of prpperty rights, accuracy, privacy, accessibility and solution suggestions againist those problems. Qu...
THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: A RESEARCH IN THE THERMAL HOTELS
The primary purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between perceived service quality and customer satisfaction. The another aim is to construct a service quality scale specifically for the thermal ho...