THE VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF WH-ADJUNCTS WITHIN ISLAND STRUCTURES IN TURKISH

Journal Title: The Journal of International Social Research - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 46

Abstract

The interpretation of the reason and purpose denoting wh-adverbials in Turkish, neden, niye, niçin ‘why’ are always problematic within syntactic islands (Arslan, 1999, Görgülü, 2006, Çakır, 2015; 2016). Reinhart (1998) focuses on the different behaviors of the wh-adverbials ‘why e.g.’ and which-NP constructions ‘which student e.g.’ in-situ and proposes a choice-function analysis for them. Following her claims, Arslan (1999) proposes that wh-adverbials niye, neden, niçin 'why' cannot be interpreted within syntactic islands in Turkish while the interpretation of the which-NP constructions like hangi amaçla ‘for what reason’ or hangi sebeple ‘with what purpose’ in such structures are possible since they dominate an N-set from which an individual can be selected. These wh-adverbials, in fact, underwent a phonological attrition process and lost some of their phonetic substances: ne + için = niçin, ne+diye = niye, ne+ABL= neden. The full forms of these wh-expressions can be viewed as wh-pronominals within postpositional phrases whose noun sets are empty. Hence, the use of ne için ‘for what’ instead of niçin ‘why’ within island structures might produce more acceptable results. In the present study, the characteristics of different types of wh-adjuncts in Turkish are analyzed through a grammaticality judgment test and a missing word completion task. The findings of the study indicate that all wh-adjuncts do not behave similarly: the acceptability of wh-adverbials, wh-pronominals in postpositional phrases and which-NP constructions differ from one another, which shed light on the adjunct & argument asymmetry observed in Turkish. The syntactic explanations for the variation in the acceptability of different types of wh-adjuncts have been presented in the study as well.

Authors and Affiliations

Sinan ÇAKIR

Keywords

Related Articles

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOLIDAY CALLED MASLENITSYA AND NEVRUZ

Maslenitsya is the name of holiday which is celebrated yearly by Slavic Nations including Russian people from March 3-9. Maslenitsya means “Oiled Holiday” and the basis of the Maslenitsya which is celebrated as a holida...

ZIONIST TERRITORIAL DEMANDS AT THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE

Zionism is the view that advocates the thought of building a Jewish National Home in Palestine. From 1897 to 1917, the Zionists struggled to get a great support from the westerners. After the developments in the beginnin...

BULL SENSE AND BELIEF IN ANCIENT SOCIETIES

In prehistoric times, nutrition for people has a priority to survive against difficult natural conditions. The people who gathered in such a way that the climatic conditions allow, have turned to hunting at times when...

POSSESSING USE OF PROSE IN MEHMET AKIF’S POETRY

Mehmet Akif Ersoy is an outstanding intellectual and a man of letters with his poems and poet identity. He uses literature so to say poetry, as a means of reaching the public. Worrying and hurting Akif’s aim is to warn t...

POINT OF VIEWS OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN TEACHERS REGARDING COMPUTER ASSISTED TEACHING AND PRACTICABILITY OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TEACHING IN THE LESSONS OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN

The aim of this study to determine technology and design teacher’s point of views regarding computer aided education and their point of views on thepracticability of computer assisted-teaching in theinstruction of techno...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252625
  • DOI 10.17719/jisr.20164622573
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sinan ÇAKIR (2016). THE VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF WH-ADJUNCTS WITHIN ISLAND STRUCTURES IN TURKISH. The Journal of International Social Research, 9(46), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252625