Theories and Uses in Common: Responses of Art in the Public Sphere
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2010, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
Different theories on public sphere(s) complete each other or collide in examining the intersubjective relationships involved in organizing and administering the responses of society to the political and economical power repertory. Habermas’s default theory, who invokes the critical participation of every citizen in the public communication, is rather extended in the counter-theories represented by Fraser’s “subaltern counterpublics”, Mouffe’s “agonistic politics” or Hardt and Negri’s “shared commons”. These observations are undertaken by artists in their public art practices and inform the contemporary art theories on audience participation.
Authors and Affiliations
Catalin Gheorghe
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP113426
- DOI -
- Views 124
- Downloads 0
Behind the “Death of the Author”: Radical French Philosophy and the Fascination of the Sacred
Jean Christophe Goddard,[i]Violence et subjectivité. Derrida, Deleuze, Maldiney[/i], Paris: Vrin, 2008
Pourquoi revient-on toujours à Darwin?
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Death Penalty in Socialist Yugoslavia and the Conflict of Normative Sources
The author analyses a discussion on death penalty that took place in Belgrade, at the end of the socialist era, between Igor Primorac and Ivan Jankovic. Primorac attacked the utilitarian justification of the socialist pe...
Tactile Reception and Life-Worldly Circumspection. Film and Urban Experience in Benjamin and Heidegger
In his famous essay, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin compares the daily experience of buildings with the perception of films. His comparison relies on the peculiar concept of “tacti...
I/You: Reciprocity, Gift-giving, and the Third Party
This essay first examines the issue of intersubjectivity in terms of the paradigmatic relationship between I and You. From a grammatical standpoint this relationship seems asymmetrical as well as necessarily performative...