To Evaluate the Diagnostic Value of Various Procedures Like Endobronchial Biopsy, Bronchial Brushing, Bronchial Aspirate/Wash and Post Bronchoscopic Sputum Specimens in Diagnosis of Lung Malignancies

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical Research Professionals - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy has become an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool for management of chest diseases and has revolutionized practice of pulmonary medicine. Therefore it was planned to perform this prospective study to know the diagnostic yield of various procedures done through FOB in patients whom there is a clinic-radiological suspicion of malignancy. Material & Methods: This prospective study was performed in patients reporting to Department of T.B. & Chest, Rama Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Patients having radiological suspicion on the basis of (X-ray chest and or CT Thorax) presenting with or without respiratory symptoms underwent diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Approval for this study was taken from the ethical committee of the College. Consent was taken from all patients included in the study. Results: Out of total 75 suspected cases included in this study 63 cases were proved of confirmed lung cancer by FOB. out of 63 cases of lung cancer, 56 (88.88%) were males, 7 (11.12%) were females. 42 (66.66%) patients resided in rural area while 21 (33.33%) patients belonged to urban areas. 90.46% of the patients were in the 30-60 years of age groups and 9.5% patients more than 60 years of age group. Squamous carcinoma is the commonest cell type 31(49.2%) & overall yield of FOB was 92% cases. Conclusion: FOB is the most valuable diagnostic procedure available which is continuously being updated with advancements. Ease of procedure under general anaesthesia, great maneurability of the instrument, minimum discomfort and complications has established FOB has procedure of first choice in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors and Affiliations

Neerav Tyagi

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study of Effect of Exercises on Respiratory Parameters Between Normal, Overweight and Obese Young Adults

Background: Obesity is defined by WHO as “excessive body fat that cause damage to the individual′s health. Alterations in the pulmonary system linked to obesity include abnormalities in ventilatory mechanics and muscle f...

Prevalence of Risky Behaviors among Secondary School Students in Selected Areas of Saudi Arabia

Background: Risky behaviors are those that potentially expose people to harm, or significant risk of harm, which will prevent them reaching their potential life and can cause a significant morbidity or even mortality. Ob...

Assessment of Diagnostic Efficacy of CT Scan and MRI in Detecting Brain Tumors

Background: Tumors in the intracranial region can arise from brain, skull, embryonic tissues, spinal cord, pituitary gland and meninges. A complete and thorough evaluation of the patient needs to be performed for the app...

Assessment of Public Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding the Use of Antibiotics among the Pregnant Women in Tabuk City

Introduction: Antibiotic resistance is a global health problem that needs a serious intervention from all governmental sectors. There have been plenty of research studies about increasing resistance of bacteria to common...

Students' Perception of Pharmacology and Teaching - Learning (T-L) Methods Used in Pharmacology

Introduction: Sound knowledge of Pharmacology plays a significant role in safe and rational use of drugs in clinical practice but the subject is difficult to understand and retain. Moreover many new drugs are introduced...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP531358
  • DOI 10.21276/ijmrp.2018.4.1.143
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Neerav Tyagi (2018). To Evaluate the Diagnostic Value of Various Procedures Like Endobronchial Biopsy, Bronchial Brushing, Bronchial Aspirate/Wash and Post Bronchoscopic Sputum Specimens in Diagnosis of Lung Malignancies. International Journal of Medical Research Professionals, 4(1), 652-655. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-531358