TO THE QUESTION ON THE PROBLEM OF QUALIFICATION OF BRIBE PROVOCATION UNDER EXECUTION THE SPECIAL TASK BY THE EMPLOYEES OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES

Journal Title: Юридичний бюлетень - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 2

Abstract

This article is due to the need to study the issue of bribery provocation, taking into account the diverse practice of the application of Article 370 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The introduction indicates the relevance and purpose of this study, which is to initiate amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as well as to form a single law enforcement practice in qualifying the bribery provocation. The main part of the work is devoted to the analysis of the issues of qualification of bribery provocation when law enforcement officers perform operational search activity or secret investigative actions within the national legislative framework. In particular, certain rules of criminal, criminal procedural legislation, as well as the other normative-legal acts, which regulate the implementation of the special tasks by authorized employees within the framework of operational search activity carrying out, are presented. Also considerable attention is paid to the analysis of the European plane in the framework of the established practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the delimitation of a crime stipulated by Article 370 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, that is, bribery provocation, from the legal actions of an official within the authority given to him during the special task performance. Taking into account the legal conclusions formulated by the European Court of Human Rights in various decisions, the article establishes approximate criteria for distinguishing a crime, namely, bribery provocation, from the lawful actions of a law enforcement officer in the performance of an official (special) task. The conclusions provide proposals on improving the criminal-law norm of bribery provocation by introducing amendments to Article 370 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, namely fixing a remark, which would become a guideline in determining the qualification of the actions of an official.

Authors and Affiliations

Юлія Шевченко

Keywords

Related Articles

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF REGULATION OF FAMILY RELATIONS IN CERTAIN ASIAN STATES

The article examines the principles of family law in the states of Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan), as well as post-socialist states of Western Asia (Azerbaijan, Armenia and...

THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE POLICE IN THE FIELD OF CRIME PREVENTION

The article is devoted to the consideration of the legal category of police management in the field of crime prevention. The article reflects the modern theoretical developments of Ukrainian and foreign scientists regard...

THE CONCEPT AND STRUCTURE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL STATUS

The article analyzes the positions of scientists in determining the structure of the administrative and legal status of public administration bodies. The attention is drawn to the fact that in the lawmaking the essential...

FORMATION OF MODERN MECHANISMS OF IMPROVEMENT OF ANTI-CORRUPTION BODIES OF THE STATE AUTHORITY IN UKRAINE

The author analyzes the basic principles of functioning of newly created anti-corruption bodies of state power. Analyzing possible mechanisms for rationalization of the functional and organizational structure of countera...

SCIENTIFIC THEORIES ON THE OBJECT OF LEGAL RELATIONS AND THE LEGAL CHARACTERISTIC OF THE GENERAL AND SPECIAL OBJECT OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LEGAL RELATIONS

The article analyzes various scientific approaches to the definition of the object of legal relations. It is emphasized that the special and general objects of civil procedural legal relations are correlated with each ot...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP600291
  • DOI -
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Юлія Шевченко (2018). TO THE QUESTION ON THE PROBLEM OF QUALIFICATION OF BRIBE PROVOCATION UNDER EXECUTION THE SPECIAL TASK BY THE EMPLOYEES OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES. Юридичний бюлетень, 7(2), 264-271. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-600291