Treatment for periprosthetic infection with two-stage revision arthroplasty with a gentamicin loaded spacer. The clinical outcomes.

Journal Title: Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja - Year 2012, Vol 14, Issue 1

Abstract

With spreading of joint replacements rises the number of complications of that surgery. Although quite rare (<1%) the periprosthetic infection (PPI) are of the most serious complications of endoprothesoplasty. Infections frustrate results of even best technically performed joint replacement, cause great damage and loss of bone and periprosthetic tissues which handicap restoration surgery. The best solution for PPI patients seems to be two-staged revision arthroplasty. In the first stage excision of implants and radical debridement of infected tissues is performed and then antibiotic-loaded spacer is implanted. After few months the second stage is performed: removal of spacer and implantation of revision endoprosthesis.The aim of the study was to evaluate efficiency of periprosthetic infection treatment with two-stage revision arthroplasty.Between January 2007 and March 2010 forty one patients with diagnosed PPI were treated in Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery of Silesian Medical University in Katowice. The complication followed in 12 cases (29%) after knee arthroplasty and in 29 cases (71%) after hip replacement. During first stage of the treatment 17 cases (41%) had no microorganism and 24 cases (59%) presented grown bacteria in taken intraoperatively smear. Cases with reinfection after revision endoprosthesoplasty (second stage of the treatment) had following results: no microorganism (1), MSSA (1), E.faecalis (1), A. baumanii concomitant with MSSA and MRSE (1).Afterward first stage of the treatment (spacer implantation) one case was not cured of the infection (2,5%). In 4 cases (10%) reinfection was presented after fixation of revision implants.Based on results of our analysis it may be presented a thesis that two-stage revision endoprothesoplasty is effective method of treatment of periprosthetic infections.

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Borowski , Damian Kusz , Piotr Wojciechowski, Łukasz Cieliński

Keywords

Related Articles

Trudności diagnostyczne w barwnikowo guzkowo-kosmkowym zapaleniu błony maziowej. Prezentacja przypadków

Barwnikowe kosmkowo-guzkowe zapalenie błony maziowej jest rzadką jednostka chorobową. Rozróżnia się postać rozlaną i ograniczoną oraz stawową i pozastawową. W literaturze światowej używano terminów xanthoma, xanthogranul...

Wpływ wybranych pierwiastków metalicznych w środowisku na występowanie osteoporozy w Województwie Śląskim

Wstęp. Jednym z najistotniejszych problemów zaburzających metabolizm wapnia jest obecność w środowisku dwuwartościowych pierwiastków metalicznych. Celem pracy było porównanie występowania osteoporozy ze skażeniem środowi...

Self-evaluation of Trunk Aesthetics in Conservatively Treated Children and Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Background. Trunk deformity is an important manifestation of idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Patients’ perception of spinal deformity and its impact on their quality of life (QoL) are important aspects of scoliosis treatment....

Znaczenie krioterapii we współczesnej rehabilitacji. Przegląd aktualnych doniesień

W pracy omówiono wyniki badań i obserwacji publikowane w piśmiennictwie polskim i zagranicznym, dotyczące stosowanej krioterapii i kriostymulacji u chorych ze schorzeniami narządu ruchu i w niektórych innych jednostkach...

Vertebral fractures in children with osteoporosis.

Background. The aim of our study was to analyze the results of biochemical, densitometic and calcaneous ultrasound examination in children with vertebral fractures. Material and methods. The study involved 19 patients (7...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP57180
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marcin Borowski, Damian Kusz, Piotr Wojciechowski, Łukasz Cieliński (2012). Treatment for periprosthetic infection with two-stage revision arthroplasty with a gentamicin loaded spacer. The clinical outcomes.. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja, 14(1), 41-54. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-57180