Ultrasound Assessment of Low Risk versus High Risk Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcome

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Sciences - Year 2014, Vol 17, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: To determine the maturational changes in the placenta by ultrasonography at various gestational ages in low risk vs. high risk pregnancies and their correlation with perinatal outcome. Subjects: Study was conducted in 100 patients with singleton pregnancies, divided into two groups: Group A (control group) having no medical or obstetrical complications in the current pregnancy and Group B (study group) having medical or obstetrical complication. All the patients were subjected to ultrasonography between 28-31 weeks, 32-37 weeks and after 37 weeks of gestation. All cases were followed till pregnancy outcome and neonates followed up to 7 days after birth. Perinatal outcome of group A and group B was compared. Results: It was observed that placental maturity increased with GA in both groups but placenta matured earlier in high risk cases. 8% patients in group A and 26% in group B showed earlier placental maturation. Patients of diabetes mellitus showed delayed maturity and lower grades were found even at termination. Incidence of LSCS was 44%in group B and 20% in group A. Good apgar score was shown when placental maturity was of higher grade. Respiratory distress syndrome was seen in only 4% neonates in group A and 8% in group B at termination with grade III placenta. 19% neonates in group A required admission to an ICU as compared to 37% in group B. Perinatal mortality was high in patients who had placental grade 0 and 1 at termination in both the groups. There was 10% perinatal mortality (4% still births and 6% neonatal deaths) in group A and 14% (4% still births and 10% neonatal deaths) in group B as high risk patients were there in group B. Conclusion: Placental grading by ultrasonography is a reliable index of foetal pulmonary maturity and it can assist the obstetrician in the management of high risk patients, thus making ultrasonography a useful tool for predicting the perinatal outcome and planning treatment modalities for termination of pregnancy.

Authors and Affiliations

Rita Thakur, Rabia Khurshid, Swarn Gupta, Cimona Lynsandanha, Abida Ahmad

Keywords

Related Articles

Factors affecting operating time in resection of Rectal Cancer

Background:- Rectal cancer continues to be a challenging disease which most of the time needs proper staging and multimodal management to achieve the best possible cure rates. For operating surgeons, many factors may pla...

Elizabethkingia Meningoseptica: An Emerging Pathogen in Pediatric Patients.

E. meningoseptica is widely distributed in fresh and salt waters, in the soil, and in some animals but is not considered a normal human microflora. It is a gram-negative non-fermentative bacillus which is found in the ho...

Clinical pattern and causative agents of adverse cutaneous drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital SKIMS Soura Srinagar

Background: Adverse drug reactions are the most frequent side effects of drugs. Most of them being benign but can prove fatal sometimes. Aim: To study the different clinical spectrum of cutaneous adverse drug reactions...

Malignant Hyperthermia: Management without DANTROLENE

Malignant Hyperthermia(MH) is a hypermetabolic syndrome which is quite rare in India. Inhalational anesthetics and succinyl choline have been reported as potent triggering agents of MH. Dantrolene remains the gold stand...

Non-Human Primates as Models for Diabetes Research: A Skeptic Outlook

Apart from numerous parallels, human beings have different evolutionary, physiological and biochemical features when compared to non-human primates. This has particular relevance to our nutrition patterns, stress (and th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP430922
  • DOI -
  • Views 40
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rita Thakur, Rabia Khurshid, Swarn Gupta, Cimona Lynsandanha, Abida Ahmad (2014). Ultrasound Assessment of Low Risk versus High Risk Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcome. Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(1), 6-10. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-430922