Validation and reproducibility of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter in the detection of glaucomatous visual field defects

Journal Title: International Journal of Ophthalmology - Year 2019, Vol 12, Issue 4

Abstract

"AIM: To validate the ability of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) in detecting glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects compared to the Octopus Visual Field (OVF) Analyzer and to determine the test-retest repeatability of both modalities. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. Glaucoma subjects and unaffected controls underwent VF testing using HEP standard automated perimetry (SAP) III 30-2 Adaptive Staircase Thresholding Algorithm (ASTA) FAST protocol and OVF G-TOP white-on-white strategy. Testing order was randomized. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for both mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation/square root of loss of variance (PSD/sLV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the diagnostic abilities of both modalities. Glaucoma subjects returned for repeat testing and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess test-retest repeatability. RESULTS: Seventy-nine subjects with glaucoma and 36 unaffected controls were enrolled. HEP and OVF were significantly correlated for both MD (r=-0.84; P<0.01) and PSD/sLV (r=0.79; P<0.01). Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were also comparable between HEP and OVF for both MD (0.74 and 0.79, respectively; P=0.26) and PSD/sLV (0.74 and 0.82; P=0.08). ICC was high for both HEP (0.96 for MD, 0.95 for PSD/sLV) and OVF (0.82 and 0.88, respectively). Mean test duration (min) was significantly shorter for OVF (2.63) compared to HEP (5.15; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: HEP and OVF show strong correlation for both MD and PSD/sLV, and have similar validity for detecting glaucoma. The test-retest repeatability is high for both HEP and OVF, however the average testing duration of HEP is significantly longer than that of OVF."

Authors and Affiliations

Jonathan S. Myers

Keywords

Related Articles

Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses

"AIM: To compare the visual functional outcomes with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: Our retrospective comparative study included 51 patients (60 eyes) received implantation of an accommo...

Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness

"AIM: To determine the effects of peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) on dynamic contour tonometry(DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study. We created a software which calculates th...

Pterygial body epithelium domination of pterygial proliferation with TCF4 as a potential key factor

"AIM: To characterize the proliferative capacity of pterygial epithelium in different regions (head, neck and body) of pterygium and explore the function of transcription factor 4 (TCF4) in pterygium proliferation. METHO...

Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in Chinese patients with POAG: fellow eye pilot study

"AIM: To compare the outcomes of Ex-PRESS implantation in one eye versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in the fellow eye in Chinese patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: This was a prospective, non...

Clinical and experimental study on angiopoietin-like protein 8 associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

"AIM: To confirm the role of angiopoietin-like protein 8 (Angptl 8) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: The sera and aqueous humor of 10 PDR patients and 10 non-diabetic retinopathy (NDR) patients (idio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP616556
  • DOI 10.18240/ijo.2019.04.08
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jonathan S. Myers (2019). Validation and reproducibility of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter in the detection of glaucomatous visual field defects. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 12(4), 577-581. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-616556