Visual hemolysis Index for routine clinical chemistry laboratory parameters

Journal Title: IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Interference substances can be significance source of error in the clinical laboratory measurements. Such errors may, in some cases represents hazards in patients. Hemolysis interferes with the Clinical Chemistry Analysis, which influence results of analytes and its leads to erroneous clinical interpretations. Hemolysis of Red cells is inevitable during the collection and handling of blood samples. In usual practice it is very difficult task to perform the rigorous analysis to evaluate interference in routine laboratories. Our objective was to assess effect of Hemolysis on routine biochemistry analysis Materials and Methods: The study followed the CLSI EP7-A2 protocol, sample were collected from 5 male subjects, aged 25-35 years, [0% (normal pool serum), serial dilution of different hemolysis grades [25% (1+coulter analyzer. The data was analyzed and ±5% difference from interferent free sample was taken as acceptable criteria.) ,50%(2+), 75%(3+) and 100%(4+)] of sample were prepared by spiking pooled serum with red cell lysate. The interference was studied up to concentrations of 0.5gm/dl for hemoglobin. Hemolysis indices graded on the basis of the appearance of the sample qualitatively ranked from “no visible hemolysis” to “4+ hemolysis. Aliquots were analyzed in triplicates using Beckman Results: The experimental design for laboratory method validation for hemolysis showed that Hemolysed samples starting from 1+ of hemolysis grade will be rejected for laboratory analysis for clinical chemistry parameters like Total bilirubin, Aspartate amino transferase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Gamaglutamyle transferase, Uric acid and serum potassium. While serum Creatinine hemolysed sample with 4+ hemolysis will not be accepted. Conclusions:Study results are useful for rejecting / to comment about the potentially misleading results in clinical chemistry parameters of clinical laboratory

Authors and Affiliations

Mohd. Azam Hyder, Marghoob Hasan, Abdel Marouf Moheildien

Keywords

Related Articles

A study of comparison between ionized calcium and albumin corrected calcium in patients with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health issue rising in alarming rate. Diseases of mineral and bone metabolism are more common in chronic kidney disease. This study was aimed to evaluate comparison between ionize...

Comparative evaluation of cephalometric data obtained from manual cephalometry versus computer aided cephalometry

Background: Digital cephalometrics is an amalgation of Traditional Cephalometry. The emergence of computerized cephalometry has develop the need to examine the advantages and drawbacks of Traditional method of cephalomet...

Differential diagnosis of radiolucencies of mandibular condyle

The mandibular condyle is a region in which tumor/tumor-like lesions rarely form; osteoma, osteochondroma, chondroma, and synovial chondromatosis being the most common pathologic enities. However these lesions are more r...

Age estimation from pulp/tooth area ratio by panoramic radiographs: In Kashmiri population

ntroduction: The aim of this study was to determine age by pulp/tooth area ratio (PTR) using three mandibular teeth by Panoramic Radiographs. Materials and Methods: A total of 225 panoramic radiographs of Kashmiri subjec...

Radiation induced oral mucositis – A case report with review of literature

Oral mucositis is a frequently occurring and debilitating complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer It is an early effect of radiation and results from mitotic death of the basal cells of the oral epithe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP472734
  • DOI 10.18231/2394-6377.2018.0045
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohd. Azam Hyder, Marghoob Hasan, Abdel Marouf Moheildien (2018). Visual hemolysis Index for routine clinical chemistry laboratory parameters. IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging, 5(2), 217-221. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-472734