W sprawie dopuszczalności odwołania poparcia dla sędziego kandydata do Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 145, Issue 2
Abstract
The opinion refers to the legal effects of withdrawing support for a judge — candidate nominated to the National Council of the Judiciary, granted by a group of at least 25 judges or a group of at least 2,000 citizens. The author points out that the provisions of the act on the National Council of the Judiciary do not comprise provisions enabling the withdrawal of support for the candidature formally submitted to the Marshal of the Sejm, in accordance with the established procedure. The author is of the opinion that the issue of legal relevance of the withdrawal of support for a specific initiative in the scope of systemic law shall result from provisions and may not be assumed. The position presented herein is founded on language, systemic and teleological interpretation
Authors and Affiliations
Adam Karczmarek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP305639
- DOI -
- Views 56
- Downloads 0
Parlament w nowozelandzkim ustroju politycznym przed i po zmianie systemu wyborczego w 1993 roku
The formation of the political and legal system of New Zealand was particularly influenced by the British constitutional practice. As the years passed, the state has departed from certain assumptions of the Westminster m...
Jeszcze o aktach prawa wewnętrznego. Z Adamem Krzywoniem nieco polemicznie
This article is a polemical response to the article by Adam Krzywoń, on the “Basis for the Issuance of Internal Legal Enactments (Based on Article 93 para. 2 of the Constitution)”, published in Przegląd Sejmowy No. 2/201...
Wizerunek Sejmu Ustawodawczego w opinii politycznych przedstawicieli społeczeństwa polskiego okresu II Rzeczypospolitej
One of the greatest mysteries, which the time was to solve, was the political, systemic, economic and social form of the state resulting from the processes accompanying the summoning of the Legislative Sejm. An argument...
Notatka na temat wątpliwości prawnych związanych z postanowieniem Sądu Najwyższego z 2 sierpnia 2018 r. (sygn. akt III UZP 4/18) w kontekście prawa polskiego
The note points to the fact that the interpretation of Article 734 and Article 755 of the Code of Civil Procedure adopted by the Supreme Court in its decision of 2 August 2018 (ref. no. III UZP 4/18) finds no confirmatio...
Przystąpienie do rokowań w sprawie ustawowej regulacji sytuacji prawnej związku wyznaniowego jako kompetencja rządu. Uwagi na kanwie wyroku włoskiego Sądu Konstytucyjnego nr 52 z 2016 r.
The article refers to the judgment no. 52 of 2016 of the Italian Constitutional Court, in which it adjudicated that the Cassation Court, in passing judgment no. 16305 of 2013 in the case concerning the refusal of the Cou...