W sprawie problemów intertemporalnych związanych z wejściem w życie art. 119 1a Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2016, Vol 50, Issue 2

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an exhaustive analysis of selected intertemporal issues arising in connection with the approval and entry into force of Article 119 [1a] of the Polish Family and Guardianship Code (KRO). In particular, its aim is to answer whether a consent for adoption, as specified in former Article 119 KRO, would remain binding after the entry into force of the amendment. Consequently, whether the court in which the adoption process was started under the former provision, would be bound by a consent expressed on its grounds even after the entry into force of the new Article 119 [1a] KRO. It was es‑ tablished that the consent to the adoption, expressed according to Article 119 KRO, would remain valid under the new (current) state of law. Consequently, it is binding on the court hearing the adoption application, even if the proceedings had not been completed before the entry into force of the Article 119 [1a] KRO. This binding aspect, of course, does not impose on the court an obligation to make an adoption order in favour of an entity (entities) named in the declaration of consent made by parents (on the basis of relevant provisions of KRO, the court may recognize, in particular, that it would be contrary to the interests of the child), however, it excludes an adoption order in favour of others. Firstly, this result appears to be completely unambiguous in the light of linguistic interpretation principles. Secondly, the linguistic result is, again unambiguously, confirmed by the system directives as consistent with principle of non-retroactivity (lex retro non agit) which is not only normatively understood but also descriptively recognized.

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Mularski

Keywords

Related Articles

Reklamowanie usług płatniczych w związku z nieprawidłowym działaniem bankomatu

The subject of the opinion is the issue of complaint regaring payment services in relation to an incorrect operation of an ATM. It was found that the complaint and possible claims related to an improper course of transac...

Opinia prawna o zgodności z Konstytucją Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej obywatelskiego projektu ustawy o ograniczeniu handlu w niedziele

The author delivers a detailed analysis of legal accuracy and compli‑ ance with the Constitution. The author notices a set of legislative errors – spelling mistakes, errors concerning provision systematics, imprecise def...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 49/15

This draft position of the Sejm concerns the motion filed by the Council of the Municipality of Kobylnica on 6th October 2015. In the proposed draft position the author claims that the contested Article 129b para. 2 subp...

Opinia w sprawie wniosku dotyczącego dyrektywy Rady w sprawie wspólnej skonsolidowanej podstawy opodatkowania osób prawnych (COM(2016) 683 final)

The subject of the opinion is the proposal for a directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base examined altogether with the proposal for a directive on a Common Corporate Tax Base (COM(2016) 685 final), as the se...

Opinia prawna w sprawie wykładni art. 24 ust. 2 ustawy o wykonywaniu mandatu posła i senatora

The opinion relates to the use of the term “occasional “ in the context of provision of office space to a Deputy for meetings with voters. This cannot apply to fixed, regular meetings of a Member of Parliament with voter...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP310009
  • DOI -
  • Views 41
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Krzysztof Mularski (2016). W sprawie problemów intertemporalnych związanych z wejściem w życie art. 119 1a Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 50(2), 32-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-310009