W sprawie problemów intertemporalnych związanych z wejściem w życie art. 119 1a Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2016, Vol 50, Issue 2

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an exhaustive analysis of selected intertemporal issues arising in connection with the approval and entry into force of Article 119 [1a] of the Polish Family and Guardianship Code (KRO). In particular, its aim is to answer whether a consent for adoption, as specified in former Article 119 KRO, would remain binding after the entry into force of the amendment. Consequently, whether the court in which the adoption process was started under the former provision, would be bound by a consent expressed on its grounds even after the entry into force of the new Article 119 [1a] KRO. It was es‑ tablished that the consent to the adoption, expressed according to Article 119 KRO, would remain valid under the new (current) state of law. Consequently, it is binding on the court hearing the adoption application, even if the proceedings had not been completed before the entry into force of the Article 119 [1a] KRO. This binding aspect, of course, does not impose on the court an obligation to make an adoption order in favour of an entity (entities) named in the declaration of consent made by parents (on the basis of relevant provisions of KRO, the court may recognize, in particular, that it would be contrary to the interests of the child), however, it excludes an adoption order in favour of others. Firstly, this result appears to be completely unambiguous in the light of linguistic interpretation principles. Secondly, the linguistic result is, again unambiguously, confirmed by the system directives as consistent with principle of non-retroactivity (lex retro non agit) which is not only normatively understood but also descriptively recognized.

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Mularski

Keywords

Related Articles

Ocena zgodności z Konstytucją przepisów ustawy o ograniczeniu handlu w niedziele i święta oraz w niektóre inne dni w zakresie zarzutu o różnicowanie pracowników co do swobody wykonywania przez nich pracy w określone dni

The President of the Lewiatan Confederation applied to the Constitutional Tribunal to evaluate certain provisions of the act, stating that these provisions provide for a differentiation of employees as to their freedom t...

Ocena tematów zawartych w notatce informacyjnej Kancelarii Węgierskiego Zgromadzenia Narodowego z uwzględnieniem szans i zagrożeń dla Polski w procesie brexitu

The author presents an analysis of withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (BREXIT) as well as expected solutions. Legal ways of withdrawal, negotiations, conditions of implementation of procedure set ou...

Udostępnienie przez organ administracji rządowej – w trybie ustawy o dostępie do informacji publicznej – korespondencji w sprawie interwencji poselskiej organowi gminy, którego dotyczy ta interwencja

The purpose of the Act on Access to Public Information is to inform citizens about public matters, and not to obtain information from entities belonging to administration by other administrative authorities. A government...

Opinia w sprawie terminu wejścia w życie rządowego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy o ochronie zdrowia przed następstwami używania tytoniu i wyrobów tytoniowych

This opinion deals with the relationship between the requirement for suspension of legislative work specified the notification procedure and the deter‑ mination of the date of entry into force of a government bill amendi...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 5/14

In the proposed draft position the author claims that the challenged provisions do not exclude the possibility of participating in the meeting of the appellate court. However, admitting the possibility of limiting the pa...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP310009
  • DOI -
  • Views 61
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Krzysztof Mularski (2016). W sprawie problemów intertemporalnych związanych z wejściem w życie art. 119 1a Kodeksu rodzinnego i opiekuńczego. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 50(2), 32-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-310009