Weighing waiting: The influence of information certainty and delay penalty on waiting for noninstrumental information
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 6
Abstract
People have been shown to delay decision making to wait for missing noninstrumental attribute information — information that would not have altered their decision if known at the outset — with this delay originally attributed to uncertainty obscuring one's true preference (Bastardi & Shafir, 1998). To test this account, relative to an alternative that delay arises from low confidence in one's preference (Tykocinski & Ruffle, 2003), we manipulated information certainty and the magnitude of a penalty for delay, the latter intended to reduce the influence of easily resolved sources of delay and to magnify any influence of uncertainty. Contrary to expectations, the results were largely inconsistent with the uncertainty account in that, under a low penalty, delay did not depend on information certainty; and, under a high penalty, delay rate was actually much lower when information was uncertain. To explain the latter, we propose that people use a strategy for resolving choice under uncertainty that does not require establishing a confident preference for each value of the missing information. These findings are related to others in which choice difficulty has been found to be a major source of delay.
Authors and Affiliations
Samuel M. Duncan, Steven M. Wengrovitz, Alexandra Sedlovskaya, and Andrea L. Patalano
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677593
- DOI -
- Views 159
- Downloads 0
The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies
According to Karl Popper, we can tell good theories from poor ones by assessing their empirical content (empirischer Gehalt), which basically reflects how much information they convey concerning the world. “The empirical...
Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes
Our previous research suggests that people reporting a stronger desire to maximize obtain worse life outcomes (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007). Here, we examine whether this finding may be explained by the decision-making...
The insurance effect: How the possession of gas masks reduces the likelihood of a missile attack
When a threat looms large in people’s minds, they may seek protective measures that could mitigate the negative outcomes associated with this threat. Paradoxically, the possession of such protective measures may, in turn...
The wisdom of crowds: Predicting a weather and climate-related event
Environmental uncertainty is at the core of much of human activity, ranging from daily decisions by individuals to long-term policy planning by governments. Yet, there is little quantitative evidence on the ability of no...
Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?
Prior studies have found that subjects prefer an improving sequence of income over a constant sequence, even if the constant sequence offers a larger present-discounted value. However, little is known about how these pre...