When does warning help and when does it harm? The impact of warning on eyewitness testimony.

Journal Title: Roczniki Psychologiczne - Year 2012, Vol 15, Issue 4

Abstract

The presented studies are concerned with the misinformation effect in the context of eyewitness testimony. The main purpose of the experiments was to present the possible consequences (positive ones and negative ones) of warning participants about inconsistencies between original and poste­vent materials to the quality of memory report. Another aim of the studies was to include an addi­tional stage in the typical procedure of researching misinformation effect: the presentation of an additional postevent material. In both experiments, after the original material was shown to them, participants were exposed to two postevent materials. One of the materials correctly repeated the information from the original material or contained neutral information, while the other one inclu­ded some misleading information. The two experiments differed in the sequence of the exposition of postevent materials. In the first study, misinformation manipulation was used in the first material. In the second study, the first postevent material was neutral or contained information correctly repeated from the original material. As expected, in Experiment 1 the tainted truth effect was observed, whereas in Experiment 2 warning eliminated the misinformation effect.

Authors and Affiliations

Malwina Szpitalak, Romuald Polczyk

Keywords

Related Articles

The Relationship between Indicators of Workaholism and Burnout in Specialists and Managers

The aim of the study was to: (1) confirm the expected positive relationships between workaholism and burnout syndrome; (2) explore the relationships between the indicators of workaholism, burnout, and seniority; (3) buil...

Personal Identity Formation Processes and the Characteristics of Self-Authoring Personality

The article presents a study concerning the relations between identity formation processes as theorized by Luyckx and colleagues (2008) and the formation of self-authoring personality according to Obuchowski (2011). The...

Odpowiedź na polemiki

W dyskusji nad moim artykułem pojawiło się kilka ważnych kwestii. Pomimo różnic poglądów, uczestnicy dyskusji byli zgodni co do tego, że chociaż zdefiniowanie dobra odbiorcy ma zasadni­cze znaczenie dla etyki zawodu, to...

Przegląd badań nad mimowolnymi wspomnieniami autobiograficznymi. Perspektywy badawcze

Przedmiotem artykułu są wspomnienia autobiograficzne powstające spontanicznie, bez wcze­śniejszej intencji ich przywołania, w populacji osób zdrowych. Mimowolne wspomnienia odróż­niono od wspomnień intruzywnych oraz wspo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP104023
  • DOI -
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Malwina Szpitalak, Romuald Polczyk (2012). When does warning help and when does it harm? The impact of warning on eyewitness testimony.. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 15(4), 51-72. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-104023