Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 69, Issue

Abstract

According to art. 11 sentence 1 k.p.c., the civil court is bound by the findings of a non-appealable verdict issued in criminal proceedings, concercing committing a crime. Generality and vagueness of this term causes considerable problems in practice, in particular with regard to binding of the civil court with findings of the criminal court on the amount of damage caused by the offender. The author, after outlining the situation of applying different procedures to the same act and identifying the normative basis of binding of the civil court with the criminal court judgment, analyzes the situations of determining the amount of property damage by the criminal court in case of conviction for: 1) crimes which element is danger of a damage property, 2) crimes which element is the possibility of causing damage to property, 3) crimes, in case of which the question of causing damage to property is with no meaning to constituting elements of a crime. It is essential whether the appropriate findings were made by the criminal court in the operative part or the grounds of the judgment. The study also addresses the problem of binding of a civil court with the conciction for an attempt of a crime.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Wantoła

Keywords

Related Articles

Non-discrimination and the Principle of Equal Treatment as Significant Constituent Parts of the Process of Shaping the Competitive Nature of Public Procurement Procedures

This article concerns about the problem of non-discriminatory problems of European and Polish public procurement law. Awarding public contracts should take account of such principles as the principle of equal treatment,...

Kształt odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej prokuratorów w świetle Prawa o prokuraturze – wybrane problemy

The material aspect of disciplinary responsibility regulated in the new act that came into force on 4th March 2016 is described in this short essay. The most interesting thing to deliberate on is the article 137 § 2 whic...

Правовые пределы свободы творчества

The author based on the fundamental ideas freedom of opinion and expression, prohibition of censorship, etc. analyses the natural and legal content of the principle of artistic freedom in copyright law and the limits of...

Ostatnie zmiany legislacyjne opłat adiacenckich

All urbanization processes causing the increase of real estate value bring benefits to their owners. This benefit provides to setting an adjacent fee. It is a quasi-tax for the benefit and reimbursement of expenditures b...

Konkurencyjność jako determinanta prawna europejskiej polityki rolnej

The article presents basic rules regarding to the evolution of legal mechanisms affecting the competitiveness of agriculture in Europe. Market mechanisms such as agricultural intervention, private storage subsidies or em...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP225667
  • DOI -
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Wantoła (2017). Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego. Studia Iuridica, 69(), 47-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-225667