Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 69, Issue

Abstract

According to art. 11 sentence 1 k.p.c., the civil court is bound by the findings of a non-appealable verdict issued in criminal proceedings, concercing committing a crime. Generality and vagueness of this term causes considerable problems in practice, in particular with regard to binding of the civil court with findings of the criminal court on the amount of damage caused by the offender. The author, after outlining the situation of applying different procedures to the same act and identifying the normative basis of binding of the civil court with the criminal court judgment, analyzes the situations of determining the amount of property damage by the criminal court in case of conviction for: 1) crimes which element is danger of a damage property, 2) crimes which element is the possibility of causing damage to property, 3) crimes, in case of which the question of causing damage to property is with no meaning to constituting elements of a crime. It is essential whether the appropriate findings were made by the criminal court in the operative part or the grounds of the judgment. The study also addresses the problem of binding of a civil court with the conciction for an attempt of a crime.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Wantoła

Keywords

Related Articles

Wpływ prac badawczych Profesora Witolda Czachórskiego na ewolucję odpowiedzialności państwa za szkody wyrządzone wykonywaniem władzy publicznej

In the course of the evolution of state liability for damages caused in the exercise of public authority the phenomenon of constitutionalisation can be observed, dating from Polish Constitution of March 1921, which guara...

Перспективы развития законодательства об исполнительном производстве в России

The article presents development of executive legislation in Russia as part of permanent reforms of Rusisian law. That reforms began with enaction of federal act of bailiffs and federal act of executive procedure in 1997...

Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances, and the Limits of Popular Sovereignty: Rethinking the Polish Experience

The principle of checks and balances counts among the most fundamental constitutional values, as it is connected with the recognition and guaranteeing of human rights – in other words is the very essence of the Constitut...

The Impact of Human Dignity on the Principles of Criminal Liability. The Example of Guilt

Human dignity is a well-known concept among Western countries since after World War II, when states, in an effort to create a new platform of cooperation with a view to guaranteeing peace, were looking for an axiological...

The Legal Status of the Energy Regulator in Ukraine in the Context of Recent Legislative Changes and European Integration

The energy sector is a strategic industry of each state. Energy industry is one of the most important regulated fields at the EU level and a crucial direction of cooperation between the EU and Ukraine. EU legislation, pr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP225667
  • DOI -
  • Views 81
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Wantoła (2017). Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego. Studia Iuridica, 69(), 47-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-225667