A comparative study of choledochorraphy (primary repair) versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: T-tube drainage used to be standard practice after surgical choledochotomy, but there is now a tendency in some canters to close the common bile duct primarily with stent in situ. This study was designed to compare the clinical results of primary closure(stent in situ) with T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy and assess the safety of primary closure with stent in situ for future application. Methods: This study was conducted at surgical Unit-3, National Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research-Jaipur from July 2017 to April 2018. Twenty patients were included in this study out of which 10 underwent primary closure with stent in situ and 10 T-tube placements. Main outcome measures were operating time, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: The age of patients in the study ranged from 25-75 years. There were 7 male while 13 female patients. Group-1 consisted of 10 patients underwent primary closure with stent in situ after choledocotomy, while Group-2 also consisted of 10 patients underwent T-tube drainage after duct exploration. Mean hospital stay in Group-1 patients was 7.63 days while in group 2 it was 13.6 days. Overall complication rate in group 1 was 20%, biliary leakage in 1 (10%), jaundice in 1 (10%). No re-exploration was required in Group-1. In Group-2 overall complication rate was 50%, biliary leakage in 2 (20%), jaundice in 1 (10%), dislodgement of T tube in 1 (10%) and wound infection in 1 (10%) patients. Re-exploration was done in one patient. Conclusion: Primary closure with stent in situ of Common Bile Duct (CBD) is a safe and cost-effective lternative procedure to routine T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Pratik J Khandal

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study of Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty vs modified Bassini’s repair along with tanner’s slide

Background: Many types of hernia repair are described, traditional methods like modified Bassini’s repair (MBR), Shouldice repair and Lichtenstein mesh repair (LMR) and currently the laparoscopic mesh repair. Numerous co...

A Study of the factors associated with the nonhealing ulcers at tertiary health care centre

Background: An ulcer is defined as a full thickness loss of epidermis and some dermis, which heals with scarring. Aims and Objectives: To Study the factors associated with the non-healing ulcers at tertiary health care c...

Nonoperative approach in children uncomplicated appendicitis at tertiary care centre

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of non-operative approach in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis using antibiotic as a first treatment plan and to assess the treatment outcome. Material and Metho d: 60 chil...

A study of necrotizing fasciitis with reference to clinical, haematological, microbiological and radiological investigations in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis represents a group of highly lethal infections characterized by rapidly progressing inflammation and necrosis. Microbiological and radiological inv patients with necrotizing fasciitis (N...

A Single centre study of role of repeat CT scans in the treatment of traumatic brain injury

Background: Traditionally, nonoperative management of Traumatic brain injury patients with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has consisted of observation and a routine repeat head CT (HCT) study at 24–48 hours after admis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP361542
  • DOI -
  • Views 153
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Pratik J Khandal (2018). A comparative study of choledochorraphy (primary repair) versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Medpulse International Journal of Surgery, 6(2), 49-52. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-361542