A comparative study of choledochorraphy (primary repair) versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy
Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 2
Abstract
Background: T-tube drainage used to be standard practice after surgical choledochotomy, but there is now a tendency in some canters to close the common bile duct primarily with stent in situ. This study was designed to compare the clinical results of primary closure(stent in situ) with T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy and assess the safety of primary closure with stent in situ for future application. Methods: This study was conducted at surgical Unit-3, National Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research-Jaipur from July 2017 to April 2018. Twenty patients were included in this study out of which 10 underwent primary closure with stent in situ and 10 T-tube placements. Main outcome measures were operating time, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: The age of patients in the study ranged from 25-75 years. There were 7 male while 13 female patients. Group-1 consisted of 10 patients underwent primary closure with stent in situ after choledocotomy, while Group-2 also consisted of 10 patients underwent T-tube drainage after duct exploration. Mean hospital stay in Group-1 patients was 7.63 days while in group 2 it was 13.6 days. Overall complication rate in group 1 was 20%, biliary leakage in 1 (10%), jaundice in 1 (10%). No re-exploration was required in Group-1. In Group-2 overall complication rate was 50%, biliary leakage in 2 (20%), jaundice in 1 (10%), dislodgement of T tube in 1 (10%) and wound infection in 1 (10%) patients. Re-exploration was done in one patient. Conclusion: Primary closure with stent in situ of Common Bile Duct (CBD) is a safe and cost-effective lternative procedure to routine T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy.
Authors and Affiliations
Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Pratik J Khandal
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP361542
- DOI -
- Views 165
- Downloads 0
A comparative study of Glyceryl Trinitrate versus surgical management of chronicanal fissure
Background: Anal fissure is an elongated ulcer in the long axis of lower anal canal causing significant morbidity due to sharp severe anal pain, especially during defecation. Young adults are the usual sufferers. Aims an...
Undescended testis as a huge abdomen mass
Cryptorchidism is a risk factor for malignant transformation.majority of undescended testis locates distal to the external inguinal ring and are palpable. seminomas are common carcinoma of testicles occurring in fourth d...
Comparison of postoperative complications of fistula in Ano managed with open fistulectomy and lift method
Background: The treatment of anal fistula is mainly surgical to eliminate the fistula prevent recurrence and preserve anal continence. LIFT (Ligation of intersphincteric fistula track) is an advanced technique for saving...
A comparative study of conventional omental patch repair versus laproscopic closure of duodenal ulcer
Background: Laparotomy has been the standard treatment of perforated peptic ulcers. Laparoscopy allows the confirmation of the diagnosis, better magnified visualization during the procedure and the identification of the...
Histopathological detection of helicobacter pylori (H.Pylori) in perforated peptic ulcer cases
Background: Helicobacter pylori have been associated with gastric and duodenal ulcers in most of the studies and data but its role in complications like peptic ulcer perforation needs to be evaluated. Objectives: To dete...